Some people work at a big place called McDonald's, and they make food for people to buy. They will tell us how much money they made and how many people bought their food. Other companies like Nasdaq, ON Semiconductor, and Sprouts Farmers Market will also tell us how much money they made and how many people bought their things. Some people are interested in knowing this information because they might want to buy or sell shares of these companies. Shares are like tiny pieces of a company that you can own. Read from source...

AI's article is a poorly written piece that lacks clarity, structure, and logical coherence. The author seems to be very biased and emotional, as he/she uses several irrational arguments and generalizations to criticize the stocks mentioned in the article. Some of the inconsistencies and biases in the article are:

1. The article focuses on McDonald's, ON Semiconductor, Nasdaq, and Pitney Bowes as the main stocks to watch, but it does not provide any clear reasons why these stocks are important or relevant to the current market situation. The author simply lists them without any explanation or context.
2. The article mentions that McDonald's shares fell 0.3% in after-hours trading, but it does not provide any information about the factors or events that caused this decline. The author also does not mention any analyst ratings or earnings expectations for McDonald's, which are important indicators of the stock's performance and potential.
3. The article states that Nasdaq reported a secondary offering of 41,604,207 shares of common stock, but it does not explain what this means for the company or its shareholders. The author also does not provide any details about the terms or conditions of the offering, or how it affects Nasdaq's financials or outlook.
4. The article claims that ON Semiconductor shares rose 1.2% in after-hours trading, but it does not provide any reasons or evidence for this increase. The author also does not mention any analyst ratings or earnings expectations for ON Semiconductor, which are important indicators of the stock's performance and potential.
5. The article mentions that Sprouts Farmers Market shares gained 1% in after-hours trading, but it does not provide any reasons or evidence for this increase. The author also does not mention any analyst ratings or earnings expectations for Sprouts Farmers Market, which are important indicators of the stock's performance and potential.
6. The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's services and features, which is irrelevant and inappropriate for a stock analysis article. The author also uses an unrelated image of a person holding a smartphone, which does not match the topic or tone of the article.

Overall, AI's article is a poorly written and biased piece that lacks clarity, structure, and logical coherence. The author does not provide any valid or reliable reasons or evidence for his/her criticisms of the stocks mentioned in the article, and he/she uses several irrational arguments and emotional behavior to manipulate the reader. The article is