Okay, so this article is talking about a company called CONSOL Energy. People can buy and sell parts of this company using something called options. Options are like bets on how the company will do in the future. The people who write articles and give opinions on what to do with money think that this company will do well, so they tell other people to buy these parts of the company. Right now, some people are selling a little bit of the company because they think it might be too expensive, but most people still want to buy it. The company is doing okay right now, but it's getting close to having another chance to show how well it's doing with something called an earnings report in 26 days. Read from source...

1. The article is focused on the options market and its implications for CONSOL Energy, but it does not provide any context or background information about the company itself, such as its main products, markets, competitors, financials, etc. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the relevance and significance of the options activities.
2. The article uses vague and misleading terms, such as "options activities associated with CONSOL Energy", which do not explain what kind of options they are referring to (call options, put options, covered calls, etc.), or how they are related to the company's performance or outlook. This creates confusion and ambiguity for readers who may not be familiar with Options Trading.
3. The article relies heavily on a single source of information, namely the RSI values, which is an arbitrary and subjective indicator that may have different meanings and interpretations depending on the context and the user. Moreover, the RSI values are not updated or validated by any other data or sources, such as volume, open interest, implied volatility, etc., which could provide more reliable and comprehensive information about the options market dynamics.
4. The article presents the expert opinions on CONSOL Energy without providing any evidence or reasoning to support them. It only mentions the average price target of $98 and the Buy rating from B. Riley Securities, but it does not explain how these ratings were derived, what assumptions they are based on, or how they compare to other experts' opinions or market trends. This makes the article seem biased and unprofessional.
5. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga Pro, which is irrelevant and annoying for readers who are looking for useful and objective information about CONSOL Energy and its options market. It also creates a conflict of interest for the author, who may have a financial incentive to encourage readers to sign up for the service.