A big company called Apple made a new rule that makes it harder and more expensive for smaller companies to use their phones. Spotify, another company, is very upset because they think this rule is not fair and breaks some other rules too. They want the people who make the rules in Europe to help them and stop Apple from doing this. If nothing changes, it could cost a lot of money for smaller companies and they might not be able to grow or succeed. Read from source...
- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It should have been something like "Spotify CEO Criticizes Apple's Proposed Alternative App Store Fee".
- The article uses words like "slams", "attacks", "farce", "disregard", and "mocking" to convey a negative tone and portray Spotify as the victim. This creates a one-sided perspective and does not acknowledge Apple's point of view or the complexity of the issue.
- The article relies on direct quotes from Ek without providing any context or explanation for his statements. For example, it mentions that he said "it will increase customer acquisition costs ten fold", but it does not specify what these costs are or how they relate to the alternative app store fee. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the implications of his argument.
- The article fails to mention any potential benefits or advantages of Apple's proposal for developers, users, or the industry as a whole. It only focuses on the drawbacks and criticisms from Spotify's perspective, which gives an incomplete and biased picture of the situation.
Bearish
Key points:
- Spotify CEO criticizes Apple's "Alternative App Store" fee as a new low and a complete and total farce
- Spotify urges the European Commission to enforce the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and reject Apple's blatant disregard for its principles
- Apple's proposed alternative could cost developers millions of dollars in yearly payments and increase customer acquisition costs tenfold
- The fee is based on the number of installs achieved by developers on iOS in the EU, which Spotify says is unfeasible and penalizes successful developers