Meta and Microsoft are mad at Apple because they think Apple is not following the rules of a big fight they had with another company called Epic Games. The fight was about how much money Apple can take from people who buy things in apps on their iPhones and iPads. A judge said that Apple should let app makers use other ways to get paid, but Apple is not doing it the way everyone thinks is best. Meta and Microsoft want Apple to follow the rules better so that they and other app makers can be treated fairly. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Apple is deliberately evading legal requirements, while the reality is more complex and nuanced. Apple has complied with some aspects of the order, but not others. A fairer headline might be "Meta And Microsoft Criticize Apple For Inadequate Compliance With Epic Games Ruling".
2. The article relies heavily on sources from Meta and Microsoft, who have their own interests in challenging Apple's policies. It would be more balanced to include perspectives from other stakeholders, such as app developers, consumers, and antitrust regulators. For example, a quote from an independent developer who supports Apple's fees or a consumer who values the security and quality of Apple's App Store.
3. The article presents Epic Games as a victim of Apple's alleged monopolistic practices, without acknowledging that Epic Games itself violated Apple's terms of service by introducing an alternative payment system in its game. This creates a false equivalence between Apple's rules and Epic Games' actions, and undermines the credibility of the article.
4. The article glosses over the details and nuances of the EU Digital Markets Act, which is meant to ensure fair competition and user choice in the digital market, not necessarily to favor external payment options or app stores. The article should explain how Apple's changes in the EU align with this regulation, and why other developers may or may not benefit from them.
5. The article exaggerates the impact of Apple's actions on Epic Games' European operations. It suggests that Apple's termination of Epic Games' developer account prevented the introduction of the Epic Games Store and Fortnite on iOS devices in Europe, while in reality, both are still available through third-party web browsers or alternative app stores that have been approved by Apple. The article should acknowledge these alternatives and their implications for user experience and security.
6. The article uses emotional language and tone throughout, such as "condemned", "violating", and "skepticism". This creates a negative impression of Apple and its actions, without providing sufficient evidence or context to support such claims. A more objective and balanced tone would be more appropriate for a news article.