Alright, imagine you're playing a game of Monopoly. In this game, some players are buying properties and house rules (this is called "stocks" in the real world), but others are also buying special cards that let them make bets on what will happen to those properties' prices in the future (that's like "options").

Now, usually when people buy these bet cards, they're either doing it because they really think a property's price is going to go up (they want to "buy low and sell high"), or they think the price might go down (then they want to "sell high and buy back low"). But sometimes, you have players who are very smart about this game, or have extra money to play with. They might be buying lots of bet cards at once, or choosing unusual ones that other players aren't thinking about.

In the news article I showed you, some people are talking about a company called "Riot Platforms". They're saying that many clever stock bet card buyers (called "smart money") have been buying lots of special cards lately that predict Riot's property prices might go down. This could mean these smart players are not very confident in Riot's game pieces right now.

The article is trying to help people who play this investment game understand what other smart players are doing, so they can make their own choices wisely. Just like how you might pay attention to what the older kids at a birthday party are doing with their Monopoly strategies! Read from source...

**Feedback on the Article:**

While your article provides some useful information about Riot Platforms' stock and recent options activity, there are several aspects that could be improved to make it more balanced, informative, and engaging. Here are some points for consideration:

1. **Inconsistencies:**
- The article mentions a volume of 18,478,271 for Riot Platforms' stock, but later suggests that smart money is taking positions on the company's options, which implies a substantial number of option contracts traded. However, it would be helpful to provide the actual volume or at least some context regarding how many option contracts were traded.
- The article mentions an anticipated earnings release in 62 days, but doesn't provide any specifics about when this estimate might change or if there are any upcoming catalysts.

2. **Biases:**
- The tone of the article is somewhat promotional, with phrases like "Stay updated on the latest options trades" and "Trade confidently." While educating readers on trading tools and platforms can be beneficial, it's important to maintain a neutral stance and avoid coming across as too sales-oriented.
- There is no mention of any opposing views or arguments against trading Riot Platforms' options. Providing a balanced perspective would help make the article more credible and engaging.

3. **Irrational arguments:**
- The claim that 20-year pro options trader's "one-line chart technique" can generate an average profit of 27% every 20 days could be seen as exaggerated or even misleading without proper context, disclaimers, or clear explanations about the potential risks involved.

4. **Emotional behavior:**
- The use of emojis (🔥) and hyperbolic language ("On fire") can make the article feel more like clickbait than a serious analysis of market developments. To maintain professionalism, it's best to avoid such elements unless they add significant value in a non-gimmicky way.

5. **Lack of context:**
- The article briefly mentions that Riot Platforms is a vertically integrated Bitcoin mining company but does not provide any deeper context about its recent financial performance, competitive landscape, or the regulatory environment affecting Bitcoin miners.
- There's minimal discussion on why large institutional investors might be taking these options positions (e.g., hedging their portfolios, speculating on short-term price movements, anticipating earnings surprises, etc.).

6. **Structural improvements:**
- The article could benefit from a clear introduction that summarizes the main takeaways and sets the stage for the discussion.
- Headings and subheadings would help break up the text and make it easier to follow.
- Adding relevant charts, graphs, or visuals could make the information more engaging and accessible.

7. **Disclaimers:**
- While the article already includes some disclaimers, adding clear warnings about the risks of trading options – especially for inexperienced investors – would be beneficial.

By addressing these points, you can create a more well-rounded, informative, and engaging article that helps readers make better-informed decisions.

Based on the provided article, the overall sentiment can be considered **negative/bearish** with a slight lean towards **neutral**. Here are the reasons for this assessment:

- The article starts by mentioning that smart money is increasingly bearish on Riot Platforms (RIOT), indicating a negative sentiment from institutional investors.
- It highlights that options activity suggests a significant increase in puts, which are used to bet against or hedge against a stock's downturn. This also implies a bearish stance.
- The mention of insider selling further fuels the negative sentiment, as it usually indicates a lack of confidence in the company's future prospects from those closest to its operations.
- However, there is no explicit bullish statement or positive data presented in the article that could balance out this negativity. Thus, while not extremely bearish, the overall tone leans towards negativity.

The article ends with general market news and Benzinga services promotion, staying neutral on RIOT's specific prospects. The final sentence does not provide a clear sentiment either way.

So, in conclusion, the sentiment of this article is mostly negative/bearish with some elements of neutrality.