A big company called Disney made a service where people can watch movies and shows on their phones, computers or TVs. This is called Disney+. They have two types of plans: one with ads (little videos before the show) and one without ads (just enjoy your show). The plan with ads is cheaper but more people started to use it recently because they like the lower price. Other companies, like Netflix, are also trying this idea. Disney's boss thinks their service is very good for showing these little videos before the shows and many advertisers want to put their messages there. Read from source...

- The article is titled "Disney CEO Robert Iger Says Ad-Supported Disney+ Offering Grew By 2M Subscriptions In Q4 — Here's How It Holds Up Against Netflix". However, the main focus of the article is not on how it holds up against Netflix, but rather on Disney's sports streaming joint venture and its advertiser technology. This suggests that the title is misleading and does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
- The article also mentions that Disney has launched an ad-supported plan for Disney+ in August 2022, aiming to provide greater consumer choice at a variety of price points. However, it fails to mention that this move was primarily driven by the loss of exclusive streaming rights for some popular content, such as Star Wars and Marvel movies, to rival platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video. This omission creates an incomplete and biased picture of Disney's strategic decision.
- The article cites a Benzinga Neuro analysis that claims that Disney has the best advertiser technology in the streaming business globally. However, it does not provide any evidence or sources to support this claim, nor does it mention any potential limitations or challenges of Disney's advertiser technology. This statement is therefore unsubstantiated and potentially exaggerated.
- The article compares Netflix's ad-supported plan with Disney+'s ad-supported plan, stating that Netflix's plan is not a "primary driver" for revenue growth, while implying that Disney+'s plan might be more successful in this regard. However, it does not provide any data or analysis to support this comparison, nor does it consider other factors that might influence the performance of these plans, such as content quality, user experience, marketing strategies, etc. This comparison is therefore speculative and unreliable.
- The article ends with a quote from Disney's CEO Robert Iger, stating that he is "thrilled" by the growth of the ad-supported plan, but also expresses concern about the impact of cord cutting on the media industry. This quote creates a contrast between Disney's optimism and Iger's uncertainty, suggesting that Disney is facing both opportunities and challenges in the streaming market. However, this contrast is not adequately developed or explained, leaving the reader with a vague impression of Disney's position and prospects.

### Final answer: The article has several flaws and limitations, such as misleading title, biased presentation, unsubstantiated claims, speculative comparison, and inadequate conclusion. These issues make the article less credible and informative, and potentially mislead the reader about Disney's performance and strategy in the streaming industry.