You see, AI, it's like when your mom bakes a really big cake for your birthday party. She puts in lots of sugar and flour and eggs to make it tasty. But sometimes, there's so much cake that she has to use more ingredients than she planned. So, the cake gets a bit more expensive than she thought. That's what happened with the company I was talking about earlier. They had to use more ingredients than they planned, so the cake (or in this case, the product they make) got a bit more expensive to make. And because it costs more to make, they have to charge you (the people who buy the cake) more for it. But don't worry, AI, they're still selling the cake. They just had to change the price a bit because of the extra ingredients they needed to use. Read from source...

r/jokes

It's clear that the article's focus is on highlighting the criticisms and arguments against the topic, rather than presenting a balanced and neutral viewpoint. This is evident in the choice of words and tone used throughout the article.

The article starts by mentioning that "a recent poll shows that a majority of Americans believe that the Bible is the word of God" without providing any context or source for this claim. This is an example of a biased statement, as it assumes that the Bible is the word of God without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

The article then goes on to mention "critics of the Bible argue that it promotes hate and violence" without providing any examples or evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an irrational argument, as it assumes that the Bible promotes hate and violence without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

The article then goes on to mention "some argue that the Bible is full of contradictions and inconsistencies" without providing any examples or evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an emotional argument, as it assumes that the Bible is full of contradictions and inconsistencies without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

The article then goes on to mention "others argue that the Bible is a myth and that its stories are not true" without providing any examples or evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an inconsistent argument, as it assumes that the Bible is a myth and that its stories are not true without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

The article then goes on to mention "some argue that the Bible is outdated and that its teachings are no longer relevant" without providing any examples or evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an irrational argument, as it assumes that the Bible is outdated and that its teachings are no longer relevant without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

The article then goes on to mention "others argue that the Bible is a tool of oppression and that it has been used to justify slavery, racism, and other forms of violence and discrimination" without providing any examples or evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an emotional argument, as it assumes that the Bible is a tool of oppression and that it has been used to justify slavery, racism, and other forms of violence and discrimination without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.

In conclusion, the article's focus is on highlighting the criticisms and arguments against the topic, rather than presenting a balanced and neutral viewpoint. This is evident in the choice of words and tone used throughout the article, which is full of biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behavior.

Neutral

- Price change in the last 12 months: -64.78%
- Price change in the last 6 months: -18.45%
- Price change in the last 3 months: -14.55%
- Price change in the last 1 month: -6.95%


Market Cap: 784.66M


Revenue (ttm): 1.77B


Earnings (ttm): -34.51M


Dividends (annual): 0.00


EPS (ttm): -0.33


Stock Split: None


### Allocation:

- Beta: 2.25

- Standard Deviation: 46.91

- Alpha: -18.76

- 3Y Growth: -11.83%

- 5Y Growth: -12.52%


### Latest News:

[Some information may be delayed or unavailable due to market conditions or technical reasons.]

- Greenlight Capital reveals its Q2 2022 portfolio; adds Tesla (TSLA) and cuts Alphabet (GOOG) — 2022-07-09 21:10:07 UTC
- Zacks.com highlights: SunCoke Energy (SXC) — 2022-07-09 18:11:54 UTC
- Zacks.com highlights: SunCoke Energy (SXC) — 2022-07-09 16:51:03 UTC
- Zacks.com highlights: SunCoke Energy (SXC) — 2022-07-09 15:50:45 UTC


### Technical analysis:

- 200 days Moving Average: 7.21

- 50 days Moving Average: 6.58

- 20 days Moving Average: 6.45

- 5 days Moving Average: 6.22


### Dividends:

- Ex Dividend: 2022-12-08

- Record Date: 2022-12-09

- Dividend Amount: 0.12 USD


### Summary:

- 52 Week Low: 4.54

- 52 Week High: 14.40

### Risk

The ETF's investment theme is directly tied to psychedelics, a niche and speculative investment sector. This creates higher risks and potentially higher rewards compared to investing in more broadly-based ETFs or individual stocks.

Investors should also consider the following risks:

- Counterparty risk: The ETF uses swaps and other derivative contracts to achieve its investment objectives. This can increase counterparty risk, as there is a possibility that the counterparties to these contracts may default on their obligations.
- Liquidity risk: The ETF's underlying holdings may have low trading volumes, which can make it difficult to buy and sell shares at fair prices.
- Concentration risk: The ETF's investment strategy focuses on a narrow sector, which can increase the risk of underperformance if the sector performs poorly.

### Alternatives

Investors seeking exposure to the psychedelics sector may want to consider investing in individual stocks or other ETFs with a similar focus. Some alternatives include:

- Champignon Brands (SHRMF): A Canadian company focused on the production of medicinal mushrooms and psychedelics for the treatment of mental health disorders.
- ATAI Life Sciences (ATAI): A German company developing psychedelic drugs for the treatment of mental health disorders.
- MindMed (MNMD): A Canadian company developing psychedelic drugs for the treatment of mental health disorders.

Investors should also consider the potential risks and rewards associated with investing in the psychedelics sector, as well as their own investment goals and risk tolerance, before making any investment decisions.

### Opportunity

The psychedelics sector has the potential to deliver significant returns for investors, as research into the use of psychedelic drugs for the treatment of mental health disorders continues to advance. The ETF's investment strategy focuses on companies involved in the development of these drugs, which could provide significant growth opportunities if successful.

In addition, the ETF's investment strategy focuses on companies with strong fundamentals and a history of delivering returns to shareholders, which could provide additional upside potential for investors.

Overall, the ETF presents an interesting investment opportunity for investors seeking exposure to the growing psychedelics sector. However, as with any investment, there are risks to consider, and investors should conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions.