Alright, imagine you're playing with your favorite toys. Now, there's a new person in charge of the playground rules who says they'll make it better for everyone. Before this new person was here, some kids (let's call them "POWs") were taken away from their families and couldn't play because they broke a rule.

The new rule-maker promised to try and bring those kids back so they can enjoy the playground with their families again. So, Cooper is hoping that this new rule-maker will keep their promise and return all the POWs home soon. Read from source...

I'd be happy to analyze the provided text based on potential critique points or areas of inconsistency. Here we go:

1. **Inconsistency in Tone**: The tone shifts between formal and informal. For instance, the sentence "Read Also: EXCLUSIVE: 40 Tons Founder Says Cannabis Company ‘A Force For Social Change’" is quite formal, while "I want to bring people of color and folks like me and show them who to pitch to; this is where the money's at," is informal and conversational.

2. **Bias**: The article appears to be biased towards Corvain Cooper and his company, 40 Tons. It presents his views and experiences without much counterargument or alternative perspectives. For example, it doesn't include any views from the California cannabis market regulators or other industry players regarding the state of the market.

3. **Lack of Concrete Evidence**: Some statements are made that could use more evidence to support them. For instance, Cooper criticizes the California cannabis market but doesn't provide specific examples or statistics to back up his claims about timely payments and higher wages in New York and Minnesota.

4. **Irrational Arguments**: There don't appear to be any irrational arguments in this text. However, the lack of a balanced view and evidence can sometimes lead to seemingly irrational conclusions due to incomplete information.

5. **Emotional Behavior**: While Cooper's quotes express passion and emotion (e.g., "I want to bring people... and show them who to pitch to"), they don't appear overly emotional or rash. The text mostly focuses on his business goals and industry critiques.

6. **Storytelling Inconsistency**: The article starts with a political sentence ("System happened to Cooper might happen to others.") and then transitions into cannabis business topics, which might seem disconnected to some readers.

7. **Repetition**: The phrase "Read Also" is repeated twice in quick succession, which could be simplified or rephrased for better flow.

8. **Lack of Context**: Some topics are touched upon briefly but lack proper context. For example, it's mentioned that Cooper attended numerous Benzinga events, but what impact these had on his business or personal growth isn't explored further.

9. **Abandoned Story Line**: The article begins with a reference to President Biden and POWs, but this storyline is not picked up again later in the text.

Neutral. The article neither expresses a strong positive nor negative sentiment about Cooper or the cannabis industry. It presents information and quotes from Cooper himself in an objective manner. Here are some reasons why it's considered neutral:

1. **No clear praise or criticism**: While there are positive aspects like Cooper wanting to bring underrepresented communities into investing spaces, and his goal to expand globally, these aren't overly praised. Similarly, while he expresses criticism of California's cannabis market, it's not strongly negative or bashing.
2. **Focus on information**: The article primarily focuses on providing information about what Cooper is doing and thinking, without adding much additional sentiment from the author.
3. **Neutral language**: The language used to describe events and situations is mostly factual and neutral in tone.

So, based on these points, the overall sentiment of the article is neutral.