Scarlett Johansson is a famous actress who did voices for a computer program called Siri. A company named OpenAI made another voice program that sounded a lot like her voice without asking her permission. The actors' union, which helps protect the rights of people who act, says that it is okay for Scarlett to be mad about this because they should have asked her first. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Scarlett Johansson is in a dispute with OpenAI over using her voice for AI purposes, but the article actually says that she has backed from actors union in the controversy, not directly against OpenAI. This creates confusion and distracts from the main issue of the unions' role in regulating AI voices.
2. The article uses vague terms like "AI voice" without defining what it means or how it differs from other forms of voice acting. This makes it hard for readers to understand the technology and its implications for the industry and the actors involved.
3. The article relies heavily on quotes from Scarlett Johansson's lawyers and the actors union, but does not provide any counterarguments or perspectives from OpenAI, other voice actors, or experts in AI ethics or policy. This creates a one-sided and potentially biased narrative that favors the union's position over the innovation of AI voices.
4. The article mentions Elon Musk's views on AI as a way of establishing credibility and authority, but does not mention any other sources or evidence to support its claims. This is lazy journalism and does not persuade readers that the issue is important or worthy of their attention.

Bullish on Scarlett Johansson and her career.