A man named Elon Musk, who is in charge of a company called Tesla that makes electric cars, got upset with some people who were protesting his factory in Germany. He said they are either very stupid or being controlled by bad people. The reason these people are protesting is because they think the factory will harm the environment and they don't like how Elon Musk does business. Read from source...

- The article uses terms like "hundreds" and "smaller group" without providing any specific numbers or sources to support these claims. This makes the reader question the credibility of the information provided.
- The article implies that environmental activists are against Tesla's expansion because they are either ignorant or manipulated by sinister forces, without acknowledging the possibility that they might have legitimate concerns about the impact of the factory on the environment and local communities. This is a classic straw man fallacy, where Musk dismisses the opponents' arguments without engaging with them in a meaningful way.
- The article focuses on the protests and counter-protests, but does not provide any context or background information about why Tesla chose to build its gigafactory in Germany, what are the benefits and drawbacks of doing so, and how it aligns with the company's sustainability goals. This leaves the reader with an incomplete and biased picture of the situation.
- The article mentions the arson attack by a far-left activist group called the "Vulkan" Group, but does not explain their motives or provide any evidence that they are connected to the protesters. It also fails to mention that Tesla has faced similar attacks in other locations, such as its factory in Fremont, California, where it was sued by local authorities for violating environmental regulations. This suggests that the article is selectively presenting information to paint Musk and Tesla in a favorable light.
- The article quotes Musk's tweet calling the arsonists "the dumbest eco-terrorists on Earth", but does not provide any context or analysis of why he said that, or how it relates to his overall stance on environmental issues. This makes the reader wonder if Musk is genuinely concerned about the environment, or just using it as a marketing tool for his products.
- The article ends with an unfinished sentence that suggests Tesla's production of electric vehicles is better than other types of vehicles powered by fossil fuels, without providing any evidence or comparison to support this claim. This leaves the reader with a vague and unconvincing impression of Tesla's environmental benefits.

Based on the article, it seems that Tesla is facing some challenges in expanding its gigafactory in Germany due to environmental activists' protests and an arson attack by a far-left group. These events could potentially disrupt Tesla's production plans and affect its stock price in the short term. However, in the long term, Tesla is likely to overcome these obstacles and continue to grow as the leader in electric vehicle market. Therefore, I would recommend buying TSLA shares with a medium-term horizon (6-12 months) and holding them until the situation in Germany stabilizes. The risk is that environmental activism could escalate and result in more violent incidents or legal actions against Tesla, which could negatively impact its reputation and stock price. However, I think this risk is low given Musk's confidence and ability to handle such situations.