Apple is a big company that makes phones, computers and other things. Some people said that Apple used videos from YouTube without asking to teach a computer how to understand words. Apple said that is not true and they only used the videos to do research, not to make their products better. Read from source...

1. The article is titled "Apple Denies Using YouTube Videos To Train Its AI Features After Report Claims Tim Cook's Company Used Creators' Content Without Consent". The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Apple was using YouTube videos without consent and that they have denied it. A more accurate title would be "Apple Clarifies That Its OpenELM Model Is Not Used To Power Any Of Its AI Features After Report Suggests Use Of YouTube Subtitles For Training".
2. The article uses the term "AI features" without explaining what it means or giving examples. This makes it difficult for the reader to understand the scope and importance of the issue.
3. The article does not provide any evidence or sources for the claim that Apple and other tech companies have used YouTube subtitles to train their AI models. It only cites an investigation that revealed the use of over 170,000 YouTube subtitles, but does not link to the investigation or explain how it is relevant to the issue at hand.
4. The article mentions that AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic have been accused of ignoring web scraping rules, but does not explain what web scraping rules are or why they are important. This makes it difficult for the reader to understand the context and implications of the issue.
5. The article quotes Apple's statement to 9to5Mac, but does not provide any context or analysis of the statement. It simply repeats the statement without questioning its validity or relevance.
6. The article concludes by mentioning that platforms like Reddit have updated their policies to block automated website scraping, but does not explain how this is related to the issue at hand or what the consequences of this policy change are.
7. The article is generally biased and emotional, as it uses words like "contentious", "concerns", "issues", and "controversies" to convey a negative tone and elicit emotional responses from the reader. It also uses sensationalist language like "without consent" and "without admitting" to imply wrongdoing and deception on the part of Apple.

Bearish

Analysis:
The article reports that Apple denies using YouTube videos to train its AI features after a report claims that Tim Cook's company used creators' content without consent. This is a negative development for Apple as it faces accusations of unethical practices and potential legal issues. The article also mentions that other tech companies and AI startups have been accused of similar practices, indicating a broader issue in the industry. The sentiment is bearish as it implies potential damage to Apple's reputation and trust among consumers and stakeholders, as well as increased regulatory scrutiny and legal risks.

Apple has denied using YouTube videos to train its AI features after a report claimed that Tim Cook's company used creators' content without consent. Apple's statement comes amid reports suggesting the use of YouTube subtitles for training. Apple has now clarified that its OpenELM model, developed solely for research purposes and to contribute to the open-source large language model development community, does not power any of its AI or machine learning features, including Apple Intelligence. The issue of tech companies using YouTube videos to train their AI models without creators' consent has been a contentious one, leading to controversies and platform updates like Reddit's policy to block automated website scraping.