A big meeting is coming up where important people will decide if they should change how much money they lend to businesses. This could make some things more expensive or cheaper in the future. People are watching closely because it might affect their jobs and savings. Last week, some companies that were doing really well went down a bit, but some people still think they will keep going up. Meanwhile, the price of a digital money called Bitcoin went very high, higher than ever before. This made many people excited. Also, some other things like oil, gold, and bonds changed a little bit in value. In Asia, most places did not do well, but two places did better than others. Europe is also opening with mixed feelings. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Wall Street expects a lower opening due to inflation data, while the article mentions only the Fed's interest rate decision as the main factor. Bitcoin's new barrier is not directly related to Wall Street or inflation data, so it should be separated from the main topic.
2. The article does not provide any evidence or sources for its claims about the market participants' expectations or the Fed's potential rate cut. It relies on hearsay and speculation rather than facts or data.
3. The article inconsistently uses the terms "Magnificent Seven" and "Magnificent 7". This shows a lack of editing and proofreading, as well as confusion about the proper naming of the group of seven stocks that have been leading the market rally.
4. The article inaccurately states that President Biden suggested lower rates at a campaign rally. In fact, he said that the economy is strong enough to handle higher rates if needed, and that inflation is temporary and not a cause for concern. He did not explicitly call for lower rates or criticize the Fed's policy.
5. The article uses emotional language and exaggerated expressions, such as "euphoria faded", "negative close", "broke the $70,000 barrier", "reach new all-time highs". This creates a biased and sensationalized tone that does not reflect the reality of the market situation. A more objective and factual approach would be more appropriate for a financial news article.