The article talks about special computer systems called Layer 2 blockchains that help make bitcoin transactions faster and cheaper. Some of these systems, like Prometeus and Mantle, have done very well and almost matched the gains made by bitcoin itself. Other systems, like Arbitrum, have not done so well and lost some value. People are wondering if these Layer 2 blockchains can keep doing well in the future or if they will lose to other ones that are not doing as good right now. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that L2 blockchains are either equal or nearly equal to Bitcoin gains, but it does not provide any evidence or analysis to support this claim. Moreover, it implies a comparison between different projects that have different goals, features, and use cases, which makes the title irrelevant and confusing.
- The article body is poorly structured and organized. It jumps from one topic to another without clear transitions or connections. It also uses vague terms like "mixed results", "underwhelming", "beat-up tokens", and "laggards" without defining them or providing any context or data. The article lacks coherence, logic, and objectivity.
- The article tone is biased and emotional. It uses phrases like "only matter of time", "flip in fortunes", and "handful of leading" to convey a sense of urgency and excitement, without backing them up with any facts or reasons. It also implies that investors should buy L2 tokens because they are undervalued and have the potential to catch up with Bitcoin, without acknowledging the risks and challenges involved in the L2 space. The article seems to be written by someone who has a vested interest in promoting L2 blockchains or is influenced by them.
- The article content is superficial and lacks depth. It does not provide any detailed analysis or explanation of how L2 blockchains work, what problems they solve, or how they differ from other solutions. It also does not mention any of the technical issues, scalability limitations, security concerns, or regulatory hurdles that L2 projects face. The article only focuses on the price performance and market capitalization of some L2 tokens, without considering their actual adoption, usage, or impact on the ecosystem.
- The article sources are unreliable and questionable. It cites a website called "CoinMarketCap" as a source of data on L2 blockchain protocols, without mentioning its methodology, accuracy, or credibility. It also quotes an analyst named "Jim Cramer", who is known for his controversial and often wrong predictions about the stock market and cryptocurrency. The article does not provide any other reputable or independent sources to support its claims or arguments.