A very important person at Apple who helped create cool things is going to retire soon. This means that a lot of people who used to work with him are also leaving, and Apple is getting new people to help make their products. Read from source...

1. The article starts with a sensationalized headline that exaggerates the significance of Andre's retirement by comparing it to the end of Ive's era. This creates a false impression that Apple's design quality and innovation will decline drastically without him. (rhetorical device: hyperbole)
2. The article relies heavily on unnamed sources from Bloomberg, which reduces its credibility and suggests a lack of independent verification. A more professional approach would be to cite official statements from Apple or interviews with Andre himself. (rhetorical device: anonymous source appeal)
3. The article repeatedly emphasizes the past achievements and contributions of both Ive and Andre, but fails to provide any evidence of how their departure will impact future products or innovations. This implies a lack of objectivity and an emotional attachment to the subject matter. (rhetorical device: nostalgia appeal)
4. The article mentions several other designers who have left Apple recently, without explaining why they are relevant or what impact they had on the company. This suggests a scattershot approach to journalism that tries to include as many details as possible without considering their significance or relevance. (rhetorical device: enumeration)