A company called Franklin Street Properties and two others are not very expensive to buy. Some important people who work there, called insiders, are buying more of their own shares because they think the prices will go up. They did well in sales recently, so that's good news for them. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that insiders are buying three stocks under $3, but in reality, only two out of the three stocks mentioned have insider buying activity. This creates a false impression of urgency and scarcity for potential investors who might be interested in the third stock without any inside information.
- The article does not provide sufficient context or background information about the companies or their industries. For example, it mentions that Franklin Street Properties posted better-than-expected quarterly sales, but it does not explain what those expectations were, how much they beat them by, or what factors contributed to the positive results. This makes it difficult for readers to evaluate the significance and reliability of this information.
- The article relies heavily on insider buying activity as a signal of potential investment opportunities, but it does not consider other factors that might influence such behavior, such as personal connections, tax implications, or diversification strategies. It also does not provide any evidence or analysis to support the claim that insiders are better informed or more knowledgeable than the average investor, which is often assumed but rarely proven.
- The article uses emotional language and vague terms to describe the stocks and their performance, such as "top," "best," "hottest," or "undervalued." These words appeal to readers' emotions and biases, rather than providing objective and factual information that they can use to make informed decisions. For example, the article states that FlexShopper is a "revolutionary" company, but it does not explain what makes it so or how it differs from other similar businesses in the market.
- The article contains several grammatical and spelling errors, such as missing punctuation, incorrect verb tenses, or misplaced modifiers. These mistakes undermine the credibility and professionalism of the author and the publication, and might also confuse or distract readers from the main message of the article.