A debate is when two people talk about their ideas and plans, usually in front of many people. The presidential candidates, Biden and Trump, had one recently. Some people bet money on who they think will win the election. After the debate, more people thought Trump would win, so his chances went up and he got more support from the money gamblers. This made some things in the financial world happy about the possibility of Trump being president again. Read from source...

- The article is written from a pro-Biden perspective and uses words like "fumbles", "halting", "awkward pauses" to describe his performance, while downplaying or ignoring Trump's aggressive tactics, unsubstantiated claims, interruptions, and lack of facts.
- The article focuses on Biden's weaknesses and ignores his strengths, such as his experience, empathy, calm demeanor, and policy proposals. It also does not mention how Trump failed to address some key issues or how he was challenged by the moderator and the audience.
- The article implies that Biden's mental acuity is questionable and uses a single anecdote of his hoarse voice as evidence, while dismissing Trump's history of lying, divisiveness, and incompetence. It also does not acknowledge how Biden's policies align with the majority of Americans' views and interests, or how he has more support from experts, organizations, and foreign leaders.
- The article relies on subjective impressions and opinions, rather than objective data and facts, to evaluate the candidates' performance and appeal. It also uses sensationalized headlines and catchy phrases to attract attention and influence readers' perceptions.

Negative
Reasoning: The article describes Biden's performance as poor and halting, with Trump gaining ground and the odds of his victory spiking. This indicates a negative sentiment towards Biden and a positive one towards Trump.

I have analyzed the article and found that it contains some relevant information about the impact of the first presidential debate on betting odds, financial markets and stock prices. However, some of the details are outdated or inaccurate, such as the reference to Jim Cramer or Benzinga Pro. Therefore, I would suggest using a more reliable source of data and analysis for making investment decisions. Some possible sources are: Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, MarketWatch, Bloomberg or Seeking Alpha.