A man named Gene Munster thinks that a company called Apple will do better than another company called Nvidia in the next year. He believes this because Apple is working on making computers and phones that can think and learn by themselves, which is called AI. Some people don't realize how important this is for Apple, but Gene Munster does. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Apple will outperform Nvidia by a significant margin over the next year, without providing any evidence or data to support this claim. This creates a false impression in the reader's mind and manipulates their expectations.
2. The author of the article, Gene Munster, is not an expert on AI or technology, but rather a former stock analyst who has been consistently wrong about Apple's prospects in the past. His credibility is questionable and his opinions should be taken with a grain of salt.
3. The article focuses heavily on Nvidia's achievements and potential in AI, while ignoring or downplaying Apple's own contributions and advancements in the field. This creates a false dichotomy between the two companies and fails to acknowledge their complementary roles in the broader ecosystem of AI development.
4. The article uses emotional language and appeals to the reader's fear or greed, by suggesting that investors are "largely in denial" about Apple's AI opportunity and that they should act quickly before it's too late. This is a classic sales tactic used to manipulate people into making impulsive decisions based on emotion rather than rational analysis.
5. The article does not provide any concrete data or evidence to back up its claims, such as revenue growth, market share, customer satisfaction, innovation, etc. Instead, it relies on vague statements and unsubstantiated assertions, which makes it difficult for the reader to evaluate the validity of the arguments presented.
6. The article fails to account for external factors that may affect the performance of both Apple and Nvidia in the future, such as regulatory changes, competitive pressures, technological disruptions, geopolitical risks, etc. This creates a narrow and myopic view of the market and ignores potential threats or opportunities that could impact the outcome of their investments.
7. The article is self-serving and promotional in nature, as it attempts to persuade the reader to subscribe to Benzinga Pro, which claims to offer exclusive news, scanners, and chat power to its users. This creates a conflict of interest between the author and the readers, and casts doubt on the objectivity and impartiality of the article.