A man named Jon Wolfenbarger is worried that the money world might have some big problems soon. He thinks the economy could slow down and make people lose money in the stock market. Some other smart people agree with him, but others think things will be okay. Read from source...

- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that Jon Wolfenbarger is a "top strategist". This is an unsubstantiated opinion without any credentials or achievements.
- The article relies on outdated and irrelevant indicators such as the Conference Board's Leading Economic Index and the yield curve inversion, which have proven to be poor predictors of economic downturns in recent years. These are classic examples of confirmation bias, where the author selectively chooses data that aligns with his preconceived beliefs.
- The article also suffers from survivorship bias, as it only mentions the performance of the "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks and ignores the thousands of other publicly traded companies that have significantly underperformed or gone bankrupt in recent years. This paints an overly optimistic picture of the market and masks the underlying risks and challenges facing many businesses.
- The article uses emotional language such as "horrific", "crash", "disaster", and "overvalued" to manipulate the reader's emotions and create a sense of urgency and fear. This is a classic propaganda technique known as pathos, which appeals to the audience's feelings rather than logic or reason.
- The article also contradicts itself by acknowledging that Wolfenbarger's forecast is more severe than other analysts, but then implying that his views are somehow more credible or authoritative. This is a logical fallacy known as the "argument from silence", which assumes that something is true because no evidence has been provided to contradict it.
- The article ends with a false dilemma, presenting two mutually exclusive options: either the market will crash and fall to new lows, or BlackRock Inc. will be proven right and the market will recover. This ignores the possibility that neither scenario may occur, or that both could happen at different times or in different sectors of the market.
- The article also fails to address the role of policy and government intervention in shaping the economic outlook. For example, it does not mention how the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, fiscal stimulus, trade wars, geopolitical tensions, or environmental risks could affect the market dynamics and investor sentiment.
- The article also neglects to consider alternative perspectives or scenarios that could challenge Wolfenbarger's pessimistic outlook. For example, it does not mention how technological innovation, consumer demand, labor productivity, or social progress could create new opportunities and growth potential for businesses and investors.
- The article also overlooks the possibility that Wolfenbarger himself

1. Sell all megacap Tech stocks immediately, as they are overvalued and vulnerable to a bear market. The "Magnificent Seven" mentioned in the article have already experienced significant declines in 2022 and will likely fall further during a potential recession.