Alright, imagine you're playing with your favorite building blocks!

- **Classical Computers** (like the one you use at school) are like regular building blocks. You can connect them together to make cool things, but only in certain ways.

- **Quantum Computers**, on the other hand, are like magic building blocks! They can connect and change forms in many more ways than regular blocks. This means they can solve some problems much faster!

Now, Nvidia is like a smart builder who wants to use both regular and magic blocks together to make the best things possible.

Even though magic blocks aren't perfect yet and might take many years to work really well, Nvidia is starting to plan ahead by hiring special block helpers. These helpers will work on making magic blocks better and finding cool new ways to connect them with regular blocks.

Some other builders are also doing this, but some investors (people who give money for building) are a bit worried because magic blocks still have problems and might take a long time to be really useful.

So, even though Nvidia thinks it'll take many years for super great magic blocks, they're starting to work on them now so they can use them in the future! Just like how you start planning your LEGO city before you actually build it. Read from source...

After reviewing the provided text from "System Story Critics", here are some potential criticisms, highlighting inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional language:

1. **Inconsistency in Timelines**: The article mentions:
- Huang's timeline for "very useful" quantum computers is 15 to 30 years.
- Nvidia's roles focus on immediate applications like weather forecasting with Earth-2 digital twin and foundational quantum research.
However, it jumps to stating that the industry consensus leans towards a 20-year horizon without explaining how these immediate applications align with the 20-year timeline for practical use.

2. **Biased Language**: The article uses loaded language when describing the stock decline post-Huang's comments:
- "significant drops" could be interpreted as indicating more severe losses than actually occurred.
- It attributes the drop to investor "caution," which may not fully capture the reasons behind the stocks' decline.

3. **Rational Argument**: The article presents the differing views of industry leaders (Huang and D-Wave's Baratz) without critically evaluating or comparing their arguments. It simply states both positions as fact, leaving readers to decide rather than providing a balanced analysis.

4. **Emotional Language**: Although not abundant, there's a hint of emotional language in phrases like:
- "Skepticism faces" (implies that the industry is under attack, which may not be entirely accurate).
- Elon Musk's sigh (mentions personal sentiment to reinforce a point).

5. **Lack of Context**: The article doesn't provide sufficient context for some statements, such as:
- It mentions Biden Admin brushing off Tesla's application but doesn't explain how this relates to the main topic: Nvidia's investment in quantum computing.
- It brings up Zuckerberg's view without explaining why his opinion is relevant or noteworthy.

To improve the article's credibility, it could benefit from:

- Clearer distinction between immediate applications and long-term practical use of quantum computers.
- Less biased language when describing market reactions.
- A critical evaluation of industry leaders' views, perhaps with expert commentary or independent analysis.
- More neutral language and less emotional phrasing.
- Relevant context for mentioned statements to maintain a clear focus on the main topic.

The article's sentiment is primarily neutral to slightly bearish due to the following reasons:

- It discusses Jensen Huang's cautious view on the timeline for practical quantum computing, ranging from 15 to 30 years.
- It mentions the decline in quantum computing stocks post-Huang's comments, indicating investor caution or skepticism.
- Both Mark Zuckerberg and Alan Baratz, while acknowledging potential in quantum computing, agree with Huang's long-term timeline.

However, there are also neutral aspects:

- The article states that Nvidia is actively hiring for quantum computing roles, showing commitment to the field.
- It mentions specific immediate applications being pursued by Nvidia, like weather forecasting and research into error correction.