A trader named Dogwifhat made a lot of money by investing in a funny dog coin called Shiba Inu. He missed out on even more money because he sold his coins too soon. Now, his own coin is doing very well and many people are excited about it. It's like when you buy a toy car that becomes very popular and its value goes up. Dogwifhat wants to make his coin worth as much as some other famous funny coins called Bonk and Pepe. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that the trader who missed out on $700 million was the same one who had a 33% gain in two days of trading Dogwifhat (WIF). This is not true, as these are different traders with different outcomes. The title should have been more accurate and less dramatic, such as "Dogwifhat Outperforms Shiba Inu Again: Trader Misses Out On $700 Million Opportunity".
2. The article uses the term "Shiba Inu Killer" to describe Dogwifhat, which is a subjective and biased opinion that may not be supported by objective data or analysis. This term also implies a negative connotation towards Shiba Inu, as if it was somehow harmed or defeated by Dogwifhat's success. A more neutral and factual way to describe the situation would be "Dogwifhat Rises As Shiba Inu Falls" or "Comparing The Performance Of Dogwifhat And Shiba Inu".
3. The article mentions a trader who made $10.9 million by holding on to his dog money since November 30, but does not provide any context or details about how much he invested, what were his initial returns, or how much risk he assumed. This makes the claim seem exaggerated and unreliable, as it could be based on a very small investment or an unusually high luck factor. A more responsible way to report this information would be to disclose the relevant numbers and ratios, such as "He turned his $10,000 investment into $11 million by holding on to 467,365 WIF that he bought for $0.21 each".
4. The article uses emotional language and expressions, such as "sitting on profits", "missing out on", "flipping at least two of these", and "hat stays on". These phrases appeal to the reader's feelings and expectations, rather than providing factual or objective information. They also create a sense of urgency and excitement, which may influence the reader's decisions or opinions without proper reasoning or evidence. A more balanced and rational way to write about Dogwifhat would be to use neutral and descriptive terms, such as "holding onto", "achieved", "targets", and "values".
5. The article relies on sources that may have conflicts of interest or lack credibility, such as Muro, a partner at ByBit and a prominent crypto trader. He is quoted as making predictions and expressing opinions about Dogwifhat, which may not be impartial or accurate. A more objective way to report