Warren Buffett is a famous investor who usually buys companies with good products and earns money from them. He also says when he thinks other companies are making bad decisions with their money. Some people on the internet wonder why he doesn't say anything about Apple, which is a very big company that makes iPhones and computers, spending lots of money to buy its own shares. This means they have fewer shares available for people to buy and it can make the share price go up. But some people think this is not a good idea because Apple might be wasting money when they could use it for other things. Read from source...

1. The article is based on a single Reddit post and does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims. This makes it an unreliable and subjective piece of journalism that lacks credibility.
2. The author uses the phrase "buying back its stock at current prices" which implies that Apple's share buyback program is a bad decision because the market price of the shares is high. However, this argument ignores the fact that companies typically use their own stock as currency to acquire other businesses or assets, and that a higher share price can be advantageous for such purposes.
3. The article references the dot-com bubble and Buffett's admission of his mistake in not investing in Amazon (AMZN) as an example of how Apple is repeating history. However, this comparison is flawed because it ignores the fact that Apple has a much stronger balance sheet, more diversified revenue streams, and higher cash flow than Amazon did during its early years. Moreover, Buffett has since invested in Amazon and expressed regret for not doing so earlier.
4. The article suggests that Apple is "burning money" by buying back its stock, which implies that the company is wasting shareholder value. However, this argument ignores the fact that buybacks can be a smart way of returning excess cash to investors, reducing debt, and improving financial metrics such as earnings per share and return on equity.
5. The article implies that Buffett should have criticized Apple's buyback program publicly, but does not provide any reason why he would benefit from doing so or what impact it would have on his own investment in the company. This argument is based on speculation and emotional reasoning rather than logical analysis.
6. The article presents various opinions on why Buffett did not oppose the buyback, but none of them are supported by any evidence or data. They are based on assumptions, speculations, and personal preferences that do not reflect the reality of Berkshire Happens's investment strategy or Apple's business performance.
7. The article ends with a quote from another Reddit user who claims that Apple has the lowest research and development spending as a percentage of revenue among its peers. However, this statement is inaccurate because it does not account for the fact that Apple generates much higher revenues than most of its competitors, and therefore has to spend more on R&D to maintain its innovation leadership. In addition, App

Neutral
Reasoning: The article does not express a clear bias towards or against Apple's share buyback. It presents different opinions and perspectives on why Buffett might not oppose the buyback, but it does not explicitly endorse any of them.