A man named Simon Kelly did something wrong while working with money and investments. He was caught by a group called CIRO that makes sure people who work with money follow the rules. Because of his mistake, he cannot work with money for six months and has to pay some money as a punishment. Read from source...

1. The notice is written in a passive-aggressive tone, as if to blame the respondent for their own actions and consequences. For example, the phrase "the Respondent's ability to conduct securities related business" implies that Simon Kelly had a choice or a privilege to do so, rather than a professional duty or right.
2. The notice does not provide any evidence or details of how Simon Kelly violated the rules or harmed the clients. It only cites vague references to "the best interests of the client" and "accepted an appointment as power of attorney". This creates a sense of uncertainty and injustice for the reader, who cannot fully understand the nature or severity of the misconduct.
3. The notice uses emotional language, such as "imposed", "sanctions", "prohibition", "fine" and "costs", to exert pressure and intimidation on Simon Kelly and the public. It also contrasts these harsh terms with the more neutral or positive ones, such as "notice of hearing" and "client". This creates a false impression that the CIRO is acting in good faith and for the benefit of the public, when in fact it may have ulterior motives or interests.
4. The notice does not acknowledge any mitigating factors or circumstances that may have influenced Simon Kelly's behavior or decision making. It also does not provide any opportunities for him to respond or appeal the notice, which violates the principles of due process and fairness.