Alright, imagine you're playing with your favorite toys. Suddenly, they stop working or acting weird. That's kind of what happened today with some big apps that lots of people use.

You might have heard of Facebook and Instagram? They're like places where people can look at pictures and talk to each other. Well, today, many people couldn't use them because something went wrong inside the computers that make these apps work.

The company that makes these apps is called Meta. They said they know about the problem and are trying to fix it as fast as they can. It's like when your mom fixes your broken toy so you can play with it again!

Don't worry, this happens sometimes with big computers and websites, just like how your toys sometimes break or run out of batteries. The important thing is that people are working on fixing the problem. Read from source...

Based on the provided text and considering journalistic standards, here are some potential critiques:

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- The article mentions multiple outage reports across Meta's apps but doesn't specify the regions affected. This inconsistency in detail could make it harder for readers to understand the scale and impact of the outages.
- It states that WhatsApp was "starting to see a return to normal" by 1:49 p.m. ET, but later notes that Downdetector was still showing thousands of outage reports. This inconsistency could sow confusion about the actual status of service recovery.

2. **Biases**:
- The article focuses heavily on Facebook and Instagram, despite WhatsApp also being a major platform affected by the outages. This could be perceived as bias towards more mainstream or popular platforms.
- The use of stock photos for illustration instead of relevant images related to the story (e.g., screenshots of error messages) might imply a lack of thoroughness in the reporting process.

3. **Irrational Arguments**:
- There are no apparent irrational arguments in this article, but it could be beneficial to include more context or analysis, such as why these outages are happening and how they affect users' daily lives or businesses that rely on these platforms.

4. **Emotional Behavior**:
- The article maintains an objective tone, focusing on facts and figures rather than evoking emotions. However, mentioning that shares were up despite the outages could be seen as suggesting a disconnect between user experience and investor confidence.
- Including user reactions (e.g., frustration, inconvenience) to the outages could add emotional depth to the story without being overly biased or sensational.

5. **Other Critiques**:
- The article lacks updates or timestamps that show when the issues started or how long they had been ongoing, which would help readers understand the story's progression.
- While the article mentions past outages by Meta, it doesn't provide much analysis or comparison of their frequency, duration, or impact – an opportunity for added context and insight.

Based on the provided article, here's the sentiment analysis:

- **Positivity**: The article discusses a temporary issue that affected Meta's apps and services but was being actively worked on.
- "Meta said… 'We're working to get things back to normal as quickly as possible'."
- "WhatsApp posted... 'starting to see a return to normal for most people'."

- **Negativity/neutrality**: There's no explicit negativity expressed towards Meta or its services. However, there are reports of outages and disruptions.
- "There were more than 90,000 outage reports..."
- "Downdetector was still showing thousands of outage reports..."
- "Meta’s status page... showed some issues."

Based on these points, the article's sentiment is **neutral** as it merely reports an incident without expressing a stance towards Meta or its services. The tone is informational rather than evaluative.

Sentiment: **Neutral**