Alright, let's imagine you and your friends are trying to guess who will win the next big school election. You all put in some of your pocket money (like $1 or $5), and you say "I think Sally will win!" or "No, I bet on Johnny!"

The person with the most correct guesses wins everyone's pocket money. This is a simple prediction market.

Now, there are grown-ups who also like to do this, but with real money and for big events like elections or sports games. A platform called Polymarket helps them do this legally. It was started offshore so that it could be used by people from all over the world, not just one country like the USA.

The boss of Polymarket said in a talk on TV that they want to come to the USA soon because lots of people there also want to guess and win real money. But right now, only some special places in America allow this kind of guessing game with real money, so they're still trying to figure it out before they officially open for business in the USA.

So, what happened is that Polymarket wants to go to the USA next, but they can't yet because of the laws there. They're just telling people they want to come soon and are figuring things out first. Read from source...

Based on the provided text from a CNBC interview and subsequent articles, here are some potential criticisms and points of inconsistency or bias:

1. **Lack of Addressing Past Issues**: Polymarket was penalized by the CFTC for regulatory violations in 2022 but doesn't appear to have adequately addressed these issues before planning expansion into the U.S. market again.

2. **Potential Market Manipulation Concerns**: The "French 'Trump Whale'" named Theo made significantly large bets on Polymarket, potentially influencing outcomes and raising concerns about foreign influence and market manipulation. However, Coplan or Polymarket doesn't seem to have addressed these serious implications publicly.

3. **Overstatement of Prediction Accuracy**: While Polymarket's successful predictions are highlighted, there's no mention of the many events where prediction markets might not have been as accurate. This could lead to an overstated perception of their effectiveness compared to traditional media and polling methods.

4. **Lack of Transparency on Platform Regulations**: The article doesn't provide much detail about how Polymarket plans to operate within U.S. regulations or how it will prevent past issues from happening again.

5. **Emotional Language**: Some parts of the interview, like Coplan stating they're in a position to be "aggressive around expansion," could be seen as emotionally charged and overconfident language, which might not always align with rational business decision-making.

6. **Bias Towards Polymarket**: The article primarily focuses on Polymarket's growth plans and successes without delving into potential challenges or providing a wider perspective from other prediction platforms or industry experts.

7. **Rival Comparison**: While Kalshi is briefly mentioned, there isn't much discussion about how Polymarket will differentiate itself in the U.S. market or compete with existing players like Robinhood.

These points could be perceived as inconsistencies, biases, or irrational arguments that might warrant further scrutiny or clarification from Polymarket and CNBC respectively.

Based on the provided article, here's a breakdown of sentiment:

1. **Positive/Bullish Aspects:**
- Polymarket is planning to enter the U.S. market aggressively.
- The platform has seen significant traffic and betting volumes, with $3.6 billion wagered on the presidential race.
- Successful prediction of election outcomes on the platform.

2. **Negative/Bearish or Neutral Aspects:**
- Polymarket is currently offshore due to regulatory issues, which prevents U.S. residents from using the platform.
- There are concerns over potential market manipulation and foreign influence, as exemplified by the case of the 'Trump Whale' bettor.

Overall, the article leans towards a **neutral to mildly positive** sentiment, focusing on Polymarket's plans for growth and past success, while acknowledging existing challenges and controversies.