Intel, a big company that makes computer parts, wants to make itself better and stronger. To do this, it plans to cut some jobs, which means some people who work there will have to find a new job. This will help the company save money and use it for new and better things. The boss of Intel, called Pat Gelsinger, also wants to make the parts that Intel makes even better than the parts made by other companies. This is important because if Intel makes better parts, more people will want to buy them and Intel will make more money. Read from source...

- The article is biased towards Intel, presenting it as an underdog struggling to regain market share, while not mentioning its competitors' strengths or challenges.
- The article uses vague and unsupported claims, such as "Intel's previously dominant position has weakened as competitors like Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD have gained market share."
- The article uses emotional language, such as "Intel plans significant job cuts to reduce costs," which could imply a negative connotation for the readers.
- The article uses inconsistent data, such as reporting that Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger is investing in R&D to regain market share, while also reporting that the company is planning to cut thousands of jobs.
- The article lacks factual information, such as the exact number of jobs to be cut, the timeline for the job cuts, and the specific details of the turnaround strategy.
- The article fails to provide a balanced view of the situation, by not including expert opinions, industry analysis, or potential risks and challenges for Intel.

### Final answer: The article is biased and unprofessional.