Tesla is a big car company that makes electric cars. The boss of the company, Elon Musk, wants to get more money for his work. Some people who own parts of the company (shareholders) have to vote on whether he gets more money or not. Tesla is spending money to tell these people about the vote through ads on the internet and other places. But some other people who also own parts of the company think that Tesla should spend money on telling everyone how good their cars are instead of just telling shareholders about Elon's pay. Read from source...

1. The article focuses too much on Musk's pay package and the shareholder vote, which is a minor issue compared to Tesla's actual business performance and future prospects. The author seems to have a negative bias against Musk and his compensation, while ignoring the fact that he is one of the most innovative and successful entrepreneurs in history.
2. The article also mentions Tesla's advertising strategy, or lack thereof, as a point of criticism. However, this is not a fair comparison, since Tesla has relied on word-of-mouth and social media presence to build its brand and customer base, which has proven to be very effective in the past. Moreover, Musk himself has stated that he prefers to spend money on improving the product and service quality rather than wasting it on conventional advertising campaigns.
3. The article cites Ross Gerber's opinion as a representative of Tesla shareholders, but fails to mention his vested interests in opposing Musk's pay package. Gerber is an activist investor who has a history of challenging executive compensation and corporate governance issues at other companies. He also manages a mutual fund that invests in electric vehicles, but not in Tesla. Therefore, his criticism of Tesla's advertising strategy may be motivated by self-interest rather than genuine concern for the company's performance or shareholders' value.
4. The article also implies that Tesla is struggling to sell its cars and needs to lower prices every week to attract customers. However, this is a misleading statement, since Tesla has consistently maintained high sales growth and market share in the EV segment, despite facing fierce competition from established automakers and new entrants. Furthermore, Tesla's price cuts are not necessarily driven by weak demand, but rather by strategic moves to increase customer affordability, improve product differentiation, and enhance brand loyalty.
5. The article ends with a question about whether Tesla should advertise its weekly sales, as if this is a simple yes or no answer. However, this ignores the complexities and trade-offs involved in Tesla's marketing strategy, which aims to balance word-of-mouth, social media, events, and other channels to create awareness and demand for its products. Moreover, Tesla's sales figures are already widely reported by third parties, such as InsideEVs and Carsdirect, which provide regular updates on the company's performance in the EV market. Therefore, advertising weekly sales may not be a meaningful or effective way to communicate Tesla's value proposition to potential customers.

Negative
Reasoning: The article highlights the contrast between Tesla's willingness to spend money on promoting a shareholder vote for Musk's pay package and its reluctance to advertise its weekly sales. This creates a negative sentiment as it shows a lack of focus on increasing product awareness and demand, which is crucial for the growth of an EV company.