A person who leads a company wrote that he thinks AI machines can learn how to make short and catchy speeches, just like people do in elevators when they meet someone new. These AI machines are very smart and can talk about many things. But sometimes, these machines can also say things that are not true or real, because they imagine them in their minds. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is a direct connection between elevator pitches and LLMs, while the main idea of the article is to compare how both can condense information and generate responses in a brief manner. A better title could be "How Elevator Pitches And LLMs Share Similarities In Information Processing".
2. The article does not provide sufficient evidence or examples to support its claim that LLMs like GPT 3.5, Gemini and Llama are known for their ability to condense information and generate responses. It relies on vague statements such as "these models can present ideas, summarize concepts and provide insights" without showing how or why they do so. A more rigorous analysis of the algorithms and data behind these models is needed to establish their capabilities and limitations.
3. The article fails to acknowledge the potential negative consequences of LLMs generating responses that are not based on facts, but rather on hallucinations, lies and biases. It only mentions this aspect in a parenthetical remark, without explaining how it affects the credibility and reliability of these models. A more balanced discussion of the benefits and risks of LLMs is necessary to inform the readers about the challenges and opportunities of using them.
4. The article does not include any quotes or insights from Sam Altman, the OpenAI CEO who supposedly agrees with the parallel between elevator pitches and LLMs. It only cites a DM sent by a user who drew this parallel, without verifying its authenticity or accuracy. A more credible source of information would be to include direct quotes from Sam Altman or his representatives, or to reference an interview or article where he expresses his opinion on this matter.