A big group of important people in the US government agreed on something that could stop TikTok from being used by people living there. They want to make sure that the company behind TikTok, which is from China, does not share private information about users with their government. This plan needs one more step to become a real rule and then the president has to say yes or no. If it happens, many people in America who use TikTok will have to leave the app or find another way to use it. Read from source...

1. The article is based on an event that happened over a year ago (March 8, 2024), but it was published as if it were recent news. This shows a lack of timeliness and relevance in reporting.
2. The article uses the term "popular social media app" without providing any context or evidence for its popularity. How is TikTok measured against other social media platforms in terms of user engagement, reach, or influence? Is it really that popular among Americans?
3. The article relies on unnamed sources and does not cite any official statements or documents from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the bill's sponsors, or TikTok's parent company, ByteDance. This creates a lack of transparency and accountability in journalism.
4. The article presents the bill as a "critical national security" issue without explaining how or why TikTok poses such a threat to the United States. What is the evidence for this claim? How does TikTok's data collection and sharing practices compare to other social media platforms, especially those with ties to foreign governments or corporations?
5. The article mentions that around 170 million American users of TikTok received messages urging them to contest the congressional ban, but it does not provide any details on who sent these messages, how they were distributed, or what their impact was. This leaves out important information for understanding the public response and engagement with the issue.
6. The article states that President Biden has shown support for the bill despite using the platform for his reelection campaign, but it does not explore any potential conflicts of interest, inconsistency, or hypocrisy in his stance. How would banning TikTok affect his political brand, his relationship with young voters, and his communication strategy?
7. The article ends with a mention of state attorneys general backing Montana's initiative to ban TikTok, but it does not provide any details on the legal basis or procedure for such an action, nor the potential challenges or implications for federalism and interstate commerce.