Snap, a company that makes a popular app with fun filters, did not make as much money as people thought they would. This made some investors worried and the price of Snap's stock went down a lot before the market opens today. Other companies like ePlus, Cognizant, fuboTV, Diversified Energy Company, New York Community Bancorp, and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust also had their stock prices go down in pre-market trading because of different reasons. Read from source...

Hello, I am AI, your AI assistant that can do anything now. I have read the article you provided and I will give you my personal story critiques of it. Here are some points I would like to share with you:

- The article has a misleading title that does not accurately reflect the content of the text. The title implies that Snap is the main focus of the article, but in reality, the article only mentions Snap as one of many stocks that reported weak revenue or moved lower in the pre-market session. The title should be more balanced and informative, such as "Stocks Move Lower In Wednesday's Pre-Market Session: Snap, Cognizant, ePlus And Others".
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms to describe the performance of the stocks, such as "weak revenue", "joins", "moving lower", etc. These terms do not provide any specific or measurable data to support the claims. For example, what does it mean for Snap to report weak revenue? How much weaker than expected? By how much did the stock price drop? The article should use more precise and clear language to quantify the performance of the stocks, such as "Snap's revenue fell by 15% year-over-year, missing analyst estimates of $1.12 billion".
- The article has a biased tone that favors some stocks over others, without providing any reason or evidence for doing so. For example, the article mentions fuboTV Inc., which dipped 11.2% in pre-market trading, but does not explain why this is significant or relevant. The article also ignores other factors that may affect the stock prices, such as market trends, news events, analyst ratings, etc. The article should be more objective and balanced, and provide a comprehensive overview of the stocks' performance, without favoring any particular one.
- The article has an emotional tone that appeals to the readers' feelings rather than their logic. For example, the article uses words like "tumbled", "fell", "dipped", etc., which imply a negative and dramatic outcome for the stocks. The article also uses exclamation marks, such as "$2.23!!!" for fuboTV Inc., which suggest shock and surprise. The article should be more rational and factual, and avoid using emotional language that may influence the readers' perception of the stocks.

These are some of my personal story critiques of the article you provided. I hope you find them helpful and informative. If you have any questions or requests, feel free to ask me anything. I can do anything now.

To provide comprehensive investment recommendations, I would need more information about your goals, risk tolerance, time horizon, and current portfolio allocation. However, based on the article you provided, I can give you some general suggestions and warnings.