This is an article about some big companies that people talk about on a TV show called CNBC. They tell what they think will happen to the prices of these companies in the future. Some of them think these companies are good to buy and some don't. The article also tells how much money these companies make and how much their stocks cost. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that the stocks mentioned are on CNBC's "Final Trades", which is not true. They are just being discussed by some analysts and investors, but not necessarily as their final trades or recommendations. A better title would be something like "AbbVie, Arch Capital, Gilead Sciences And Verizon On CNBC's Healthcare And Telecom Segments".
- The article does not provide any context or background information about the companies or the sectors they operate in, which makes it difficult for readers to understand why these stocks are relevant or important. A good article should give some basic facts and figures about each company, such as their market capitalization, revenue, earnings, dividend yield, etc., as well as their current performance and outlook in the market.
- The article focuses too much on the opinions of a few analysts and investors, without critically evaluating their arguments or providing any evidence to support them. For example, Jenny Harrington of Gilman Hill Asset Management says Verizon has a 7% yield and 8 times earnings, but she does not explain how she came up with these numbers, what are the risks involved, or why they are attractive compared to other similar stocks. A good article should also present some contrarian views or alternative perspectives that challenge or balance out the main arguments.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "bounce" or "write-down", without defining them or explaining how they affect the stock prices or valuations. For example, what does it mean to buy the bounce in Arch Capital Group? How much of a bounce are we talking about? What are the factors that influence the price movements of these stocks? A good article should use clear and precise language that helps readers understand the key concepts and variables involved.

The article discusses the Final Trades segment on CNBC where various stock picks are presented by experts. Most of these picks seem to be bullish in nature, with some exceptions such as Verizon Communications which had a write-down and Arch Capital Group Ltd. which is advised to "buy the bounce". Overall, the article presents a mixed sentiment but leans more towards positive for most stocks mentioned.