So, there is a new AI system called Gemini 1.5 Pro that can do some really cool things! Here are six amazing things it can do:

1. Understand long videos and find the best parts: It's like having a friend who can watch a whole basketball game with you and tell you which dunks were the best.
2. Compare movie scripts to help choose what to watch: You know how sometimes you want to pick a movie, but you don't know which one? Well, this AI can look at the stories of different movies and help you decide which one is more interesting.
3. Translate languages that few people speak: Imagine if you had a magic tool that could change words from one language into another language that only a few people understand. That's what Gemini 1.5 Pro can do!
4. Find out if a video was made by AI or not: You know how sometimes videos look fake? Well, this AI can help you figure out if they were really made by computers or not.
5. Understand important parts of long documents: Sometimes we read big papers with lots of words and it's hard to find the most important parts. But Gemini 1.5 Pro can do that for us! It can look at a big paper and tell us which part is really interesting.
6. Give personalized movie reviews: Have you ever wanted to know what someone thinks about a movie before watching it? Well, this AI can read the whole script of a movie and give you three important quotes from it that will help you decide if you want to watch it or not. Read from source...

Firstly, I find it highly unethical and misleading that the author of this article would choose to use a private and exclusive AI model like Gemini 1.5 Pro for his personal tests and experiments. He is creating an false impression that this model is superior and more capable than other existing models in the market, which is not necessarily true. Moreover, he is violating the privacy and security of the developers and researchers who have access to this model and its data.

Secondly, I find it irrational and illogical that the author would waste his time and resources on such trivial and insignificant tasks as comparing movie transcripts or finding the highest-scoring dunk in a basketball contest. These are not real-world problems or challenges that require the attention of AI models like Gemini 1.5 Pro, which should be focused on more important and meaningful issues such as climate change, healthcare, education, etc.

Thirdly, I find it biased and unprofessional that the author would use a subjective and personal criterion of choosing movies to watch next based on Gemini 1.5 Pro's analysis of movie transcripts. He does not provide any objective or evidence-based criteria for how he decides what makes a good movie, nor does he acknowledge the potential limitations and errors of his AI model in understanding human emotions, creativity, and artistic expression.

Fourthly, I find it highly amusing and ironic that the author would try to pass a language into one spoken by fewer than 2000 individuals via Gemini 1.5 Pro, when he himself does not seem to have any proficiency or knowledge of this language. He does not explain how he obtained the English newsletter, why he chose this specific language, or what purpose it serves for him to translate it into Saterlandic. This seems like a mere demonstration of his own ignorance and arrogance, rather than a genuine test of Gemini 1.5 Pro's capabilities.

Fifthly, I find it unconvincing and unsatisfactory that the author would use Gemini 1.5 Pro to discern whether a video is AI-generated or not, when there are already existing and reliable methods and tools for doing so. He does not provide any details or examples of how his AI model performs this task, nor does he acknowledge the possibility of error or misclassification. Moreover, he does not address the ethical and legal implications of identifying and exposing AI-generated content, which could have negative consequences for the creators and consumers of such content.

Sixthly, I find it trivial and irrelevant that the author would use Gemini 1.5 Pro to extract