A website called Benzinga wrote an article about four financial stocks that might help your money grow this year. They picked Meridian, Ares Comml Real Est, and two other companies because they think these stocks are not priced too high compared to how well the companies are doing. This means you can buy them for a good price and maybe make more money if the companies do well. The article also says that sometimes when people sell stocks quickly and scared, the prices of the stocks go down too much. That's what happened with these four companies recently. But Benzinga thinks this is a chance to buy them for an even better price now. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and clickbait. It implies that there are only four financial stocks that can rescue your portfolio this quarter, when in reality there are many more options to consider depending on one's risk profile, investment goals, and time horizon. The author should have been more clear and specific about the criteria used to select these four stocks and how they compare to other potential choices.
2. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claims that these four stocks are undervalued or have strong growth prospects. It merely cites the RSI as a momentum indicator, without explaining what it is, how it works, or why it is relevant for investors. The author should have included some charts, graphs, or tables to illustrate the performance and valuation of these stocks over time and relative to their peers and the market.
3. The article focuses too much on the negative aspects of New York Community Bancorp's recent earnings report and dividend cut, without giving any context or perspective. It does not mention how the bank's fundamentals, such as its asset quality, profitability, capital adequacy, or franchise value, have been affected by these events. It also does not consider how the market has reacted to these news and whether it presents an opportunity for long-term investors who believe in the bank's resilience and growth potential.
4. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "worse-than-expected", "reduced", and "slashed", to describe the bank's financial results and dividend policy. This suggests that the author has a negative bias against this stock and is trying to discourage readers from investing in it. The author should have been more objective and balanced, acknowledging both the challenges and opportunities that the bank faces and how they affect its value proposition for shareholders.