Some smart people who used to work at a company called OpenAI are worried about how powerful computers can think and do things by themselves. They want governments to make rules to control these smart machines, because they could be AIgerous if nobody tells them what to do. This is like when the internet was new and there were no rules for it, so some people did bad things with it. These smart people are not the only ones who think this way; even a famous car maker named Elon Musk and the boss of Google agree that we need to be careful with these computers. Some places like the United States and Europe are trying to make rules for how these smart machines can behave safely. Read from source...

- The authors of the article are former OpenAI board members who have a vested interest in promoting stricter AI regulation and shaping public opinion.
- They use fear-minding tactics to appeal to emotions and manipulate readers into supporting their cause, such as "humanity's sake", "unacceptable risk", etc.
- They ignore the potential benefits of AI development for society, economy, innovation, and human welfare, focusing only on the possible risks and harms.
- They compare the current situation with the internet in the 1990s, without considering the differences in technology, governance, ethics, and regulation between AI and the internet.
- They imply that private tech firms have sole control of AI development, without acknowledging the role of academic research, government funding, public interest, and civil society in shaping AI advances.
- They do not provide any concrete examples or evidence of how effective AI regulatory frameworks would look like, what they would entail, or how they would be enforced.