Key points:
- A top official in the nuclear security agency, Frank Rose, left his job.
- His boss wrote a memo saying he was nice and good at leading, but some people complained about him being mean and harassing them.
- There was an investigation to find out if he did something wrong. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that the internal memo contradicted or invalidated the sexual harassment allegations against Rose, when in fact it did not address them at all.
2. The article does not provide any evidence or details of the alleged harassment incidents or the victims involved, nor does it explain how Rose's behavior violated the DOE's policy on workplace misconduct.
3. The article relies heavily on unnamed sources and vague statements from the DOE and NNSA officials, which undermines its credibility and objectivity.
4. The article contrasts Rose's leadership qualities with the harassment allegations, as if they were mutually exclusive or incompatible, when in fact many people can exhibit both positive and negative traits in their professional and personal lives.
5. The article fails to mention any consequences or actions taken by the DOE or NNSA against Rose, such as suspension, demotion, or termination, which would indicate that he was held accountable for his alleged misconduct.

Possible title: Biden's DOE Official Under Sexual Harassment Probe: How To Invest Amidst Controversy