Peter Thiel is a famous person who talks about how important it is to have the people who start a company stay in charge of it. He thinks that these people, called founders, can make something really great because they care a lot about their work and have special ideas. He says that if you replace them with someone else, like a professional boss, it might not be as good. He tells a story about Mark Zuckerberg, who started Facebook, and how he didn't sell his company to another big company called Yahoo for lots of money. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Thiel was talking specifically about Zuckerberg's decision not to sell Facebook to Yahoo, while in reality he was giving a more general example of how founder-led companies can outperform professional CEOs.
- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support Thiel's claim that founder-led companies are more successful than those led by professionals, and only cites his book "Zero to One" as a source, which is self-promotional and subjective.
- The article also does not address the potential downsides of having an unconventional or extreme founder, such as their lack of strategic vision, inability to scale, high turnover rate, legal issues, etc., nor does it mention any counterexamples of successful companies that were sold to larger entities and benefited from the synergies and resources.
- The article seems to have a positive bias towards Palantir Technologies, as it mentions Thiel's role as a co-founder and chairman without providing any context or disclosure, and does not mention any of his controversial or divisive actions or statements that might affect his credibility or reputation.