Google is a big company that helps people find information on the internet. Sometimes, people make fake pictures or videos of others and put them online. This is bad and can hurt the people in the pictures or videos. Google is working on a way to stop these fake pictures and videos from showing up when people search for them. They are also trying to make it harder for people to find these fake pictures and videos on their website. Other big companies like Facebook and Twitter are also working on ways to stop fake pictures and videos from being shared online. Read from source...

- The article story is a news report about Google's efforts to combat deepfake porn in search results, not an opinion piece. However, the author uses phrases like "tackle the issue" and "tackle the problem" which imply a negative connotation and a problem-solving perspective, rather than a neutral or informative one.
- The article story criticizes other tech companies like Meta and X for not taking enough action against deepfake porn, without providing any evidence or sources to support this claim. This is a logical fallacy of argument from silence, which assumes that because something has not been addressed, it must be true or important.
- The article story mentions a bill introduced by U.S. lawmakers to mandate social media companies to remove deepfake porn from their platforms, but does not explain how the bill would work, what its implications would be, or whether it has any support or opposition in the legislature. This is a weak attempt to appeal to authority, which is a logical fallacy that cites a source or an authority as a way of convincing the audience, without considering whether the source or authority is relevant, credible, or trustworthy.
- The article story cites a blog post by Meta's internal Oversight Board as a source for calling for clearer regulations against AI-generated pornographic content, but does not link to the blog post or provide any details or quotes from it. This is another example of argument from silence, as well as a logical fallacy of argument from authority, which cites an authority as a way of convincing the audience, without considering whether the authority is relevant, credible, or trustworthy.
- The article story uses emotional language and imagery, such as "disturbing surge" and "fake explicit images", to describe the problem of deepfake porn, without providing any data or statistics to quantify the scale or impact of the problem. This is a rhetorical device of pathos, which appeals to the emotions of the audience, rather than the logic or reason. However, using emotional language and imagery without backing them up with facts or evidence can also be seen as manipulative or sensationalist, which can undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of the author and the source.

### Final answer: AI's review criticizes the article story for being inconsistent, biased, irrational, and emotional.

neutral
Article's Main Points:
- Google is taking action against deepfake porn in search results
- Other tech giants like Meta and X are also tackling the issue
- New online safety features will simplify the removal of explicit deepfakes from Search and prevent them from ranking highly