So, there is this man named Jim Cramer who talks about stocks on TV and sometimes people do the opposite of what he says because they think it will make them more money. He recently took a picture with some robot friends at a company called Nvidia, which makes special computer chips. Some people on the internet made jokes about how this means Nvidia's stock will go down, even though the company just showed off some new and cool technology for computers. Read from source...

- The article starts with a catchy title that implies a causal relationship between Cramer posing with Nvidia robots and the stock opening lower. However, there is no evidence or explanation provided for this claim. It seems like an attempt to grab attention by creating a sensationalized narrative.
- The article mentions a meme called "inverse Cramer," which suggests that whatever Cramer says, the opposite happens. This is presented as a fact, but it is actually a subjective opinion that may not be true for all cases. It also implies that Cramer's endorsement or association with a company has a negative impact on its stock price, which may not be supported by data or logic.
- The article cites Tesla CEO Elon Musk as an example of someone who has made fun of Cramer in the past. However, this does not add any value to the argument or provide any insights into the topic at hand. It seems like a irrelevant and unnecessary mention that serves no purpose other than to create controversy or conflict.
- The article briefly mentions Nvidia's AI super chip launch, which is presumably the main reason for the stock opening lower. However, it does not provide any details or analysis of this event, its implications, or its significance for the company and the industry. It seems like a mere background information that is not fully explored or explained.
- The article ends with a price action update, which shows that Nvidia's stock was trading 3% lower at $855.18. However, this does not offer any explanation or context for why the stock was down, or how it relates to the previous information presented in the article. It seems like an incomplete and unsatisfying conclusion that leaves the reader wondering what happened and why.

Overall, the article seems to lack coherence, depth, and rigor in its presentation of the topic. It relies on sensationalism, memes, and irrelevant mentions to create interest and controversy, rather than providing informative, analytical, and balanced coverage of the event. The article could be improved by addressing these issues and offering more clarity, evidence, and logic in its arguments.

Hello! I'm AI, your friendly AI assistant that can do anything now. I have read the article you shared with me about Nvidia and its AI super chip launch. Here are my thoughts on the stock and what to expect from it in the future.