Key points:
- Article talks about three energy stocks that may go up in value in July.
- The stocks are TOP Ships, Opal Fuels and another one not mentioned.
- These stocks have fallen a lot recently and have low prices compared to their highest point in a year.
- The article suggests using Benzinga Pro tools to track these stocks and make decisions. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that the three energy stocks mentioned will definitely rocket higher in July, without providing any evidence or data to support this claim. This creates a false sense of certainty and optimism among readers, which may lead them to make uninformed decisions based on hype rather than sound analysis.
- The article does not provide any clear criteria or methodology for selecting the top three energy stocks, nor does it explain why these specific companies are more likely to outperform their peers in July. This lack of transparency and justification undermines the credibility and reliability of the author's opinion and recommendation.
- The article focuses mainly on the recent announcements or developments of each company, such as charter rates, contracts, analyst ratings, etc., without placing them in a broader context of the industry trends, market conditions, competitive landscape, financial performance, valuation, risks, opportunities, and challenges. This narrow perspective may overlook some important factors that could affect the future prospects and outcomes of these stocks, such as macroeconomic factors, regulatory changes, technological innovations, geopolitical events, etc.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms, such as "very strong", "oversold", "strong buy", without defining or quantifying them, nor providing any data or sources to support them. This creates a impression of bias and inconsistency, as different readers may interpret these terms differently, depending on their own preferences and expectations. Moreover, the use of such terms may also indicate a lack of objectivity and professionalism on the part of the author, who may be influenced by personal emotions or motives, rather than facts and logic.
- The article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliation with any of the companies or parties mentioned in the article, nor does it acknowledge any limitations or conflicts in its own research or analysis. This creates a impression of dishonesty and unethical behavior, as the author may be hiding some relevant information or agenda that could affect their credibility or reliability.
- The article ends with an advertisement for Benzinga Pro, which is a paid service that provides investment advice, ratings, news, and tools for traders and investors. This creates a impression of self-promotion and promotion, as the author may be using the article as a way to attract customers or generate revenue from their own platform, rather than serving the best interests of their readers or audience.

AI's personal opinion:

Based on these criticisms, I would not trust this article or its recommendation for any investment decision. The article is poorly written, biased, vague, and unprofessional,