A website called Benzinga wrote an article about how the US stock market might open without much change today. They also talked about Bitcoin, a digital money that has become very popular and expensive, going above $73,000. The article mentioned that some experts think people should earn more money in their jobs to make up for rising prices of things we buy. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is a significant change in the stock market or crypto prices, but the actual data shows otherwise. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq are expected to open mostly flat today, which is not very different from yesterday's close.
2. The article mentions the U.S. inflation data as a factor that influenced the Asian markets, but it does not provide any evidence or explanation for how this data affected sentiment in each market. It also ignores other possible factors, such as economic indicators, corporate earnings, geopolitical events, etc.
3. The article reports on gold's dull performance, without discussing its implications for the financial markets or investors. Gold is often seen as a safe-haven asset that can benefit from inflation and uncertainty. Why did it lose its appeal this time? What are the alternatives to gold in the current market environment?
4. The article quotes an analyst who stresses the need for robust earnings, but does not provide any context or analysis of how companies are performing or what to expect from their results. It also fails to mention that earnings season is over and most companies have already reported their quarterly numbers. How relevant is this statement for the current situation?
5. The article ends with a copyright notice that seems out of place and unnecessary. It does not add any value or information to the readers, but rather reminds them of the source's ownership rights. Why include it at the end instead of the beginning or in the footer?