Trump was unhappy with DeWine's decision to say no to a health care plan. Meanwhile, DeWine has a big problem in Ohio because of new rules about weed being legal. The article talks about how some people make money from selling weed and the writer wants you to know about it. He also mentions other things like news tips, tools for finance, and ways to advertise. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Trump criticized DeWine for his healthcare veto and his handling of the legal weed program in Ohio. However, the article does not provide any direct quotes or evidence of such criticism from Trump or his administration.
- The article also uses vague terms like "grapples" and "messy" to describe DeWine's situation with the legal weed program. These words suggest that DeWine is struggling or facing opposition, but do not provide any concrete details or facts about the challenges he faces.
- The article then abruptly shifts gears to promote a canna stock newsletter and its supposed "smoking-hot gains". This is irrelevant and unethical, as it attempts to profit from the reader's interest in the topic by advertising a product that has no connection to the main story.
- The article lacks any analysis or context for the legal weed program in Ohio and its implications for DeWine's political career. It does not explain why the program is controversial, how it affects the state budget, public health, or crime rates, or what other policies DeWine has implemented or plans to implement regarding cannabis.
- The article also fails to mention any positive aspects of DeWine's veto, such as his reasons for rejecting the bill, his alternative proposals, or his track record on healthcare reform. It portrays him as a solely negative figure who is out of touch with the voters and the market demand for weed.
- The article overall is poorly written, unprofessional, and biased. It does not meet the standards of journalism or provide any value to the reader.