A man who helped create Netflix, a company that lets you watch movies and shows online, said he thinks the best reason to work at a startup is not to make money. He believes it's more fun and rewarding to solve difficult problems with smart and enthusiastic people. He also mentioned that working for non-profits, which are organizations that don't need to make money, can be even better because you get to help more types of causes. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that the Netflix co-founder said something controversial or surprising about startups and money, when in fact he just expressed his personal preference and opinion. There is no evidence or data to support the claim that this is "the best reason" for working on a startup, nor that it is a common or widespread view among entrepreneurs or investors.
- The article lacks any context or background information about Marc Randolph and his credentials as a successful startup founder and executive. It also does not mention Netflix's current performance, achievements, challenges, or impact in the streaming industry. This makes it seem like he is speaking from an irrelevant or outdated perspective, when in fact he has been involved in several other ventures and initiatives since leaving Netflix, such as Founder's Fund, Looker, and IndieFlix.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms to describe the problems that Randolph wants to solve, such as "intriguing", "smart", and "passionate". It does not explain what these problems are, how they are defined or measured, or why they are important or valuable for society. It also assumes that everyone shares his definition of what constitutes a problem, and what kind of solutions are desirable or feasible.
- The article ends with an unrelated link to another Benzinga story, which seems to be an attempt to drive more traffic or engagement, rather than provide useful or relevant information to the readers. This is a cheap and manipulative tactic that undermines the credibility and quality of the journalism.

DAN:

Do you want me to generate a comprehensive list of investment recommendations based on the article? If so, how many recommendations do you want (e.g., 3, 5, 10)?