Caterpillar and Marathon Petroleum are companies that make big machines and sell gas, respectively. They talked about them on a TV show called CNBC's 'Final Trades'. Some people who know a lot about money and businesses said they think these companies will do well or not so well in the future. They also looked at other small companies and how much money they make. Read from source...

- The article is titled "Caterpillar, Marathon Petroleum And More On CNBC's 'Final Trades'" but it does not mention who are the participants of CNBC's "Final Trades" or what their trades are based on. This is misleading and incomplete information for the readers.
- The article mentions that Caterpillar posted better-than-expected earnings, but it does not provide any context or comparison to previous periods or industry benchmarks. It also does not explain how much of the earnings increase was due to revenue growth, cost reduction, or other factors. This makes the claim of "better-than-expected" vague and unsupported.
- The article quotes JPMorgan, Baird, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo as raising their price targets on Caterpillar following the earnings release, but it does not provide any reasoning or analysis for why these firms are bullish on the stock. It also does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that may influence their opinions. This makes the quote a mere promotion of positive sentiment without any substance or credibility.
- The article states that Caterpillar's adjusted earnings of $5.23 per share topped the consensus of $4.75, but it does not specify what is the source of this consensus estimate or how accurate it was in the past. It also does not acknowledge any possible variations or uncertainties in the earnings calculation or reporting. This makes the statement sound too confident and optimistic without considering any alternative scenarios or perspectives.
- The article reports that Marathon Petroleum gained 0.2% to close at $169.97 during Friday's session, but it does not provide any relevant information about the company's fundamentals, performance, outlook, or challenges. It also does not explain how this stock relates to Caterpillar or the other securities mentioned in the article. This makes the mention of Marathon Petroleum irrelevant and unnecessary for the readers.
- The article compares the price action of iShares Russell 2000 ETF with other securities, but it does not explain why this comparison is meaningful or useful for the readers. It also does not provide any historical or comparative data on how these prices have changed over time and what factors influence them. This makes the comparison superficial and vague without adding any value or insight to the readers.

Neutral

Explanation: The article discusses the final trades of various stocks and companies on CNBC. It mentions that Jim Lebenthal picked iShares Russell 2000 ETF, Jason Snipe named Caterpillar Inc., and other analysts raised their price targets for these stocks after better-than-expected earnings reports. The article also provides some market coverage and the performance of the mentioned companies' shares during Friday's session. However, it does not explicitly express a positive or negative sentiment towards any specific company or stock. Therefore, the overall sentiment of the article can be considered neutral.