A big boss in Europe, Ursula von der Leyen, said they might ban TikTok there too. She thinks it's AIgerous because it can harm people. This happened after the US president also wanted to ban TikTok unless its owner sells it. Some other companies that are like TikTok's rivals have important people in the government as their investors. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that the EU leader is threatening a ban on TikTok without providing any evidence or concrete plans.
2. The article focuses on the U.S. situation, but the European Commission president's statement was made in response to a question during a debate, not as an official announcement or policy change.
3. The moderator's reference to the U.S. situation is irrelevant and biased, as it does not reflect the EU's own assessment of TikTok's security risks or its legal framework for regulating online platforms.
4. The article cites von der Leyen's statement that "we know exactly the AIger of TikTok" without providing any context or explanation for what she meant by that, implying a negative and suspicious attitude towards the platform.
5. The article mentions TikTok's setbacks in Europe, but does not mention the reasons behind them, such as the Commission's investigation under the Digital Services Act, which is a new regulation aimed at ensuring online safety and accountability for platforms.
6. The article implies that ByteDance prefers a shutdown or ban over selling TikTok in the U.S., without mentioning that the company has repeatedly denied any intentions of selling the platform, despite repeated pressures from the U.S. government.
7. The article suggests that implementing a ban could advantage TikTok's competitors in the U.S., such as Meta and Snap, without providing any evidence or analysis of how that would happen, or what implications it would have for the global market and user choice.