So, there are two people who talk about money stuff. One is named Peter Schiff and the other is Mark Cuban. Peter Schiff thinks that gold is better than Bitcoin, which is a digital money thing. But Mark Cuban likes Bitcoin more than gold. Now, when Bitcoin was doing really well and cost a lot of money, some people thought it was not good to have because it can change its value very quickly. Peter Schiff said that this makes Bitcoin not safe and not good for saving money. But Mark Cuban still likes Bitcoin even though it has gone down in price a little bit. They both want other people to listen to them and agree with their ideas about money. Read from source...

- The article is titled in a misleading way, as it does not present a balanced view of both sides of the argument. It implies that picking Bitcoin over gold is a mistake, while it could be a valid choice depending on the investor's goals and risk tolerance.
- The author relies on Peter Schiff as a credible source, despite his history of making false or exaggerated claims about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. For example, he predicted that Bitcoin would crash to $100 in 2018, but it instead reached almost $20,000 by the end of the year. He also claimed that gold would outperform Bitcoin in 2020, but it was the opposite scenario. Therefore, his opinion should be taken with a grain of salt.
- The author uses Bitcoin's volatility as a negative factor, while ignoring the potential benefits of diversifying one's portfolio with an asset that has different correlations and risk factors than gold. Moreover, Bitcoin's volatility has been decreasing over time, as it matures as an asset class and becomes more integrated into the mainstream financial system.
- The author does not acknowledge the possibility that gold could also experience a similar or even higher degree of volatility in the future, especially if there are changes in interest rates, inflation, geopolitical events, etc. Gold is not as safe haven as some people believe it to be, and its value can be influenced by various factors beyond investors' control.
- The author does not provide any data or analysis to support the claim that gold is a better store of value than Bitcoin. He simply states his opinion without backing it up with evidence or logic. For example, he could have compared the returns of both assets over different time periods, or measured their performance against inflation or other indicators of purchasing power.
- The author seems to have a personal bias against Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general, as he uses derogatory language such as "Shark" and quotes Peter Schiff, who is known for being anti-Bitcoin. This could affect his credibility and objectivity when reporting on the topic.

bearish on Bitcoin and gold

- Bitcoin is highly volatile and unpredictable, but it has shown tremendous growth potential in recent years. It can be a good long-term investment option for those who are willing to tolerate high risk and accept the possibility of significant losses. Some factors that may affect Bitcoin's price include market demand, regulatory environment, technological advancements, competition from other cryptocurrencies, and public sentiment.
- Gold is a traditional safe haven asset that has been used as a store of value for centuries. It tends to perform well during times of economic uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, but it can also be affected by inflation, interest rates, currency fluctuations, and demand from industries such as jewelry and electronics. Gold may appeal to investors who are looking for a more stable and less risky alternative to Bitcoin or other stocks and bonds.
- Peter Schiff is an outspoken critic of Bitcoin and a proponent of gold, so his views should be taken with a grain of salt. He has been wrong about many predictions in the past, such as the price of gold and the performance of the stock market. He may have ulterior motives for bashing Bitcoin, such as promoting his own gold-related businesses or attracting attention to himself.