Alright buddy, imagine you're on a big adventure with your friends, but your mom wants to know where you are to keep you safe. You know how sometimes you play hide and seek and it's hard for her to find you? This new feature on Snapchat is like having a special map that shows your exact location to the people you trust, so they can always know if you're at home, school, or even playing in the park with your friends. It's an opt-in feature, which means you and your family have to choose to use it, and you can change your mind any time you want too. This way, everyone stays safe and knows where to find each other when needed! Read from source...

Here are some potential criticisms of the given article on Snapchat's new location-sharing feature, focusing on inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behavior:

1. **Inconsistency in messaging**:
- The article starts by emphasizing user safety and providing parental control tools but ends with highlighting legal challenges and privacy concerns.
- On one hand, the author presents this feature as a solution for parents to track their teens' locations. However, they also mention that it's an opt-in feature available only to friends and family, which might not be effective for ensuring all users are safe without proper education on usage.

2. **Biases**:
- The article does not explore the perspective of Snapchat users or teenagers who may use the app. It mainly presents the viewpoints of parents and lawmakers.
- There's no mention of potential benefits this feature could bring to users, such as mutual location sharing between friends or family members.

3. **Irrational arguments**:
- The article suggests that introducing location-sharing in the midst of legal challenges may lead to additional scrutiny, implying that Snapchat should not have rolled out this feature now. However, it's reasonable for companies to introduce new features while addressing ongoing issues.
- It doesn't explain why the automatic deletion of messages complicates user safety. While it might make evidence gathering more difficult, it also helps protect users' conversations from persistent storage and potential misuse.

4. **Emotional behavior**:
- The article concludes by stating that "Snapchat's decision to roll out location sharing... may lead to additional scrutiny," using the phrase "lead to" multiple times. This phrasing creates a sense of foreboding, implying that negative outcomes are inevitable.
- The mention of minors being targeted for "sextortion" and other forms of exploitation invokes fear, but it doesn't provide context or explain how this new feature could contribute to or mitigate these problems.

5. **Lack of solutions-focused approach**:
- While the article highlights concerns and challenges, it fails to propose potential solutions to address them or suggest best practices for users to adopt this new feature safely.
- It also does not discuss Snapchat's response plan regarding the lawsuit and how they aim to improve user safety in light of these legal issues.

Based on the provided article, here's the sentiment analysis:

- **Benzing**