A long time ago, Apple was working on making a special car that would drive itself and not need a person to control it. This car looked very different from other cars and had cool features inside. But Apple decided not to make the car anymore, which made many people sad. A writer named Mark Gurman shared what he knew about how the car would look and what it could do if Apple had made it. Read from source...

- Gurman's insights are based on unverified and anonymous sources, which may not be reliable or accurate. He also has a vested interest in hyping up Apple products as he is an Apple analyst and author of several books about the company.
- The article focuses too much on the design aspects of the car and ignores other important factors such as performance, safety, cost, market demand, and environmental impact.
- The claim that the Apple car would have "wowed consumers" is subjective and not supported by any evidence or data. It also implies that current EV market offerings are inferior or disappointing, which may not be true for many customers who prefer different features and styles.
- The comparison with Lifestyle Vehicle is unfair and misleading, as they are very different types of companies and products. Lifestyle Vehicle is a niche startup that focuses on luxury and customization, while Apple is a global tech giant that has much higher standards and expectations from its customers and investors.
- The description of the interior as a "contoured bubble" suggests a lack of innovation and creativity, as well as a potential safety issue in case of an accident or collision. It also implies that Apple is trying to replicate the private jet experience on the road, which may not be appealing or realistic for most drivers.
- The statement that the car was "optimized for full, Level 5 self-driving" is vague and exaggerated, as there is no clear definition or regulation of what constitutes Level 5 autonomy. It also overlooks the ethical, legal, and social implications of such a technology, which may pose significant challenges and risks for consumers and society.
- The article does not provide any concrete information or details about the technical specifications, performance metrics, pricing, availability, or timeline of the Apple car project, which would be more relevant and informative for readers who are interested in this topic.

Neutral
Explanation: The article is mostly factual and does not express a strong opinion or emotion about the topic. It reports on Gurman's insights into Apple's defunct car project, its design evolution, and how it would have stood out in the EV market. There are no clear indications of whether the author or Gurman are bullish or bearish on the potential success of an Apple car. The tone is mostly descriptive and informative, with some nostalgia for what could have been.