A long time ago, there was a company called Theranos that wanted to make a machine that could test your blood without using needles. But their machine didn't work as they said it would, and they got in big trouble. Now, some other companies have made machines that can do what Theranos said they could. These new machines can test your blood with just a few drops and no needles, and they are starting to be used more and more. Read from source...

AI's Feedback: - There are several issues with the story: - The title is misleading and sensationalist: it implies that Theranos's failed dream has been brought to life by other firms, but the reality is that these firms have developed their own technologies that are not directly derived from Theranos's approach. - The story uses vague and imprecise language: for example, "these firms have been working on technologies", "the dream of Theranos for finger-prick blood tests is now a reality", "these companies have introduced their finger-prick blood tests in Austin, Texas". These statements do not provide specific details on who, what, when, where, how, and why of the situation. - The story lacks evidence and sources: it does not cite any data, studies, or reports that support the claims made in the story. It also does not provide any quotes or testimonials from the companies or experts involved in the development or adoption of the finger-prick blood tests. - The story relies on secondary sources: it cites The Wall Street Journal as the primary source of information, but does not provide a link or a reference to the original article. It also uses Shutterstock images that are not relevant or appropriate for the story. - The story has a biased and emotional tone: it compares the situation to Theranos's downfall, implying that these firms are trying to achieve what Theranos failed to do, and that they are facing similar challenges and risks. It also uses words like "game-changer", "reality", "demand", and "popular" to convey a positive and exaggerated view of the finger-prick blood tests, without providing any balanced or critical perspective.

### Final response:
final