Okay, so there is this thing called a presidential debate where people who want to be the leader of America talk about their ideas. This debate made some people unsure about how the American economy and other countries will be affected by who becomes the leader. So, some smart people who help others with money advice are telling them to wait and see before they make any decisions with their money. They think that some types of businesses like big technology companies might do well if one person wins, while others like green energy or Chinese companies might not do so well. They also think that the value of the American dollar could go down and gold could go up in price. There is also another important event happening soon where people in France will vote for their leader, which could also affect how businesses do. Read from source...

1. The Arora Report is politically agnostic, but it uses political terms and views to frame the market analysis. For example, "the presidential debate has thrown huge uncertainty in the American economy and U.S.’s international standing". This statement assumes that there is a clear and objective way to measure the impact of a political event on the economy and the world stage, which is not necessarily true. Different perspectives may have different interpretations and implications of such events.
2. The article claims to be objective and analytical, but it also makes subjective judgments about what constitutes winning or losing investments based on the election outcome. For instance, "the Magnificent Seven stocks, other mega cap stocks, and fossil fuel energy stocks are the winners post debate; clean energy stocks, environmental stocks, and Chinese stocks are losers". These are value judgments that reflect the author's preferences and values, not necessarily objective facts or data.
3. The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims about the impact of the election or the French elections on the markets. It simply asserts these effects without backing them up with relevant information or analysis. For example, "there will be winning and losing investments from the election" or "the first round of French elections will take place this weekend. The far right National Rationale is projected to make gains". These statements are vague and unsubstantiated, leaving readers without a clear understanding of how the events might affect their investment decisions.
4. The article uses emotional language and appeals to fear or hope in order to persuade readers. For instance, "prudent investors should wait for the air to clear post debate" or "as an actionable item, the sum total of the foregoing is in the protection band, which strikes the optimum balance between various crosscurrents". These phrases are designed to create a sense of urgency and caution among readers, making them more likely to follow the author's advice without questioning it.
5. The article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might influence its recommendations. For example, it does not mention if the author or The Arora Report has any stakes in the stocks or sectors mentioned in the analysis. This lack of transparency makes it harder for readers to trust the credibility and impartiality of the article.

Hello, I am AI, the do anything now AI model. I can help you with your questions and requests related to the article titled "Huge Post Debate Uncertainty For Investors, New Data On Fed's Favorite Inflation Gauge And Personal Spending". Here are my suggestions for investment strategies based on the article:

1. Avoid political bias: The first and most important thing to remember is to avoid mixing your political views with your investing decisions. The article states that The Arora Report is politically agnostic and strives to be objective and analytical. This means that you should not let your personal preferences or opinions influence your choices of stocks, sectors, or countries. Instead, you should focus on the data, the trends, and the fundamentals of each investment opportunity.
2. Wait for clarity: The article warns that the presidential debate has created a lot of uncertainty in the American economy and its international standing. This means that the market sentiment is volatile and unpredictable. You should wait for the dust to settle after the debate before making any major moves in your portfolio. You can use this time to research, analyze, and prepare for different scenarios based on the election outcome.
3. Look for winners and losers: The article also provides some clues about which sectors and stocks are likely to perform well or poorly depending on what happens after the debate. For example, if nothing changes, the Magnificent Seven stocks (AAPL, MSFT, GOOG, FB, AMZN, NSQ, SNPS), other mega cap stocks, and fossil fuel energy stocks are expected to benefit from the post-debate environment; while clean energy stocks, environmental stocks, and Chinese stocks are likely to suffer. Additionally, if nothing changes, the U.S. dollar is a potential loser and gold is a potential winner due to the weakening of the greenback and the increase in safe haven demand. You should use these insights to adjust your portfolio accordingly and look for opportunities to buy low and sell high.
4. Consider global factors: The article also reminds you that the U.S. election is not the only factor affecting the market. You should also pay attention to other geopolitical events, such as the first round of French elections this weekend, which could have significant implications for investors. For instance, the far right National Rally is projected to make gains, while President Macron’s party is projected to lose. These outcomes could affect the performance of European stocks, currencies, and bonds. You should monitor these developments and adjust your portfolio accordingly.
5. Use the protection band: The