A lady who started a health company thinks we need special rules for computers that can think and make decisions by themselves, called AI. She says these computers should only help us and not secretly make choices against us. This is important because our rights might be affected if these computers are not fair to everyone. Other places like Europe already have some rules for AI, but we need more in the U.S. too. Read from source...

- The article is written by a health startup co-founder who has a vested interest in promoting AI regulation and ethical concerns. This creates a potential conflict of interest and bias in the presentation of the topic.
- The article uses vague terms such as "hidden calculations" and "acting solely on our behalf" without providing concrete examples or evidence to support these claims. This makes the argument less convincing and credible.
- The article relies heavily on emotional appeals and fear-mongering, rather than logical reasoning and data-driven analysis. For example, the statement "civil rights can't exist in a world of hidden calculations" is an emotional appeal that does not logically follow from the previous statements or provide any factual support.
- The article ignores the potential benefits and advancements of AI in various sectors, such as healthcare, finance, education, etc. It also fails to acknowledge the ongoing efforts by researchers, developers, and policymakers to address the ethical and social implications of AI use.
- The article compares the situation with AI to that of a lawyer or doctor without considering the differences in the nature, scope, and objectives of these professions. AI is not meant to replace human professionals, but rather to assist them and enhance their capabilities.