Alright, imagine you have a big house with many rooms. Bitcoin is like a funny little gnome who moves in without asking (that's the "squatter" part). At first, people are upset because they didn't choose to live with this gnome. Some people just ignore him, some laugh at him, and others get really angry.

But this gnome has a magic trick: over time, he collects tiny golden coins that fall from the sky (that's how new Bitcoins are created). At first, nobody knows what these coins are good for, but eventually, people start to notice that they can use them to buy things or even become rich!

So now, some people think the gnome is awesome and want to give him more rooms in their house. Others still don't like him, but they can't ignore him anymore because he's become a part of their big house (the internet and the world economy).

The funny thing is, nobody really knows how long this gnome will stay or what he'll do next, which makes some people nervous. But for now, he's here, and many people are trying to figure out how to make the best of living with him. Some even say that in a way, we're all richer because of his magic trick! Read from source...

Based on the provided article, here are some points highlighting potential inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behaviors in Peter Schiff's stance on Bitcoin:

1. **Inconsistency**: Schiff often criticizes Bitcoin but hasn't provided evidence that he doesn't own any himself. Critics have accused him of secretly owning Bitcoin due to his consistent mentions of the cryptocurrency on social media. However, Schiff has not addressed these accusations directly or transparently.

2. **Bias and Emotional Behavior**:
- **Sarcasm as a Communication Tool**: Schiff often uses sarcasm and exaggeration (e.g., suggesting the Social Security Trust Fund sell Treasuries to buy Bitcoin) to make his points, which can come across as emotionally charged and biased.
- **Ad Hominem Attacks**: In response to Woo's comment, Schiff resorted to an ad hominem attack by questioning Woo's credibility based on a perceived lack of followers, rather than engaging with the substance of Woo's argument.

3. **Irrational Arguments**:
- **Black Swan Argument**: Schiff often predicts impending doom for Bitcoin without presenting concrete evidence or acknowledging any potential upside. This can be seen as an irrational fear-based argument.
- **Misconstruing Bitcoin's Nature**: Schiff frequently misrepresents Bitcoin's purpose and nature, claiming it has no intrinsic value, is not money, and cannot serve as a store of value. However, many economists and financial experts disagree with these assertions.

4. **Selective Perception**:
- Schiff tends to focus on the negatives and uncertainties surrounding Bitcoin while ignoring or downplaying its potential positive aspects such as decentralization, censorship-resistance, and, in recent years, growing adoption by institutional investors.
- He also tends to overlook other forms of currency and investments that share similar risks with Bitcoin.

Regarding Willy Woo's comment, it can be seen as emotionally charged and overly simplistic. While he makes a valid point about Bitcoin's psychological impact on society, his statement "you buy it and become rich or you keep hating and turn crazy" oversimplifies the complex world of investing and dismisses rational criticism of Bitcoin.

Based on the content of the article, here's a sentiment analysis:

**Benzinga and Woo:**
- Positive: The article reports Willy Woo's perspective on Bitcoin in a neutral to positive light. Woo's comparison of Bitcoin to a "squatter living rent-free in people’s minds" is presented as an interesting take rather than a criticism.

**Schiff:**
- Negative/Bearish: Peter Schiff's comments are primarily critical of Bitcoin, suggesting it could lead to economic catastrophes and predicting significant losses when the bubble pops. He is also accused by critics of making these comments for engagement farming purposes while potentially secretly owning Bitcoin.

Overall, the article presents a mix of views but leans more towards neutral to positive sentiment regarding Bitcoin due to Woo's unique perspective, despite including Schiff's bearish outlook.